Search results
Oct 1, 2018 · The findings shed light on how we perceive speech in our everyday lives and could have particular implications for individuals with hearing loss, who have even greater difficulty understanding speech in noisy settings: These individuals might benefit even more from familiar voices.
Oct 1, 2018 · A new study from Western University’s BrainsCAN initiative shows that familiar voices are easier to understand even if a person doesn’t recognize them as familiar. The findings were published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
Oct 1, 2018 · Image Source: NeuroscienceNews.com image is adapted from the APS news release. Original Research: Abstract for “Familiar Voices Are More Intelligible, Even if They Are Not Recognized as Familiar” by Emma Holmes, Ysabel Domingo, and Ingrid S. Johnsrude in Psychological Science. Published August 10 2018. doi: 10.1177/0956797618779083.
Jul 25, 2023 · Familiar voices are the voices of people whose identities are known to us, for example, because they are famous (e.g. actors and politicians), known to us in our personal lives (e.g. family and ...
Jun 19, 2017 · These studies have found that we can actually recognise voices of familiar people’s speech quite well. But they have also shown that there are problems: ear-witness testimonies are notoriously ...
Familiar Voices Are Easier to Understand, Even If We Don’t Recognize Them October 01, 2018 Familiar voices are easier to understand and this advantage holds even if when we aren’t able to identify who those familiar voices belong to, according to research in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
People also ask
What is a 'familiar voice'?
How are familiar voices represented?
Can We recognise voices of familiar people's speech?
How do people perceive person characteristics from unfamiliar voices?
May 23, 2020 · To answer these questions, we conducted a series of three experiments in which we manipulated the types of familiarity listeners had with the voices (familiarized through laboratory-based training [Experiments 1 and 2] vs previously familiar through watching a TV show [Experiment 3]) as well as the type of knowledge familiar listeners had access to (no semantic knowledge [Experiments 1 and 2 ...
