Search results
R v Oakes [1986] 1 SCR 103 is a Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the legal test for whether a government action infringing a right under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is justified.
R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103. Her Majesty The Queen Appellant; and. David Edwin Oakes Respondent. File No.: 17550. 1985: March 12; 1986: February 28. Present: Dickson C.J. and Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson and Le Dain JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario.
This page contains a form to search the Supreme Court of Canada case information database. You can search by the SCC 5-digit case number, by name or word in the style of cause, or by file number from the appeal court.
Feb 7, 2006 · In R v. Oakes (1986), David E. Oakes was accused of possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking. The Supreme Court of Canada concluded that section 8 of the Narcotic Control Act runs counter to the presumption of innocence enshrined in section 11 (d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms .
Nov 15, 2014 · CASE – R v Oakes. Importance of this case: ·SC’s first comprehensive treatment of meaning of s. 1. ·Primary referent for 2 nd stage of Charter adjudication. Facts: Narcotic Control Act created presumption that possession of a narcotic created presumption that the intent was to traffic (unless the accused established the absence of such an ...
Jul 4, 2019 · Learn about the Oakes test, a framework for deciding whether government action that infringes a Charter right is justified. The test has four steps: objective, rational connection, minimal impairment, and proportionality.
Nov 28, 2014 · R. v. Oakes is a landmark case that established the Oakes test for assessing the constitutionality of legislation that limits Charter rights. The case involved a challenge to a reverse onus clause that presumed intent to traffic drugs based on possession of narcotics.
