Search results
5 days ago · The Supreme Court recently released its decision in Garland v. Cargill, the case about ATF’s bump stock ban – or more precisely, ATF’s 2018 classification of bump stocks as machine gun conversion devices under the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). In a 6-3 decision, the Court invalidated the regulation.
Jun 20, 2024 · The Court held in Garland v. Cargill that the agency exceeded its statutory authority by classifying semiautomatic rifles equipped with bump stocks as “machineguns” under the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).
6 days ago · Cargill case and its ruling on bump stocks. This video provides an in-depth analysis of the court's decision, its implications for gun regulations, and the broader legal landscape. Perfect for ...
Jun 27, 2024 · In an opinion written by Justice Thomas, and joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett, the Court held that the ATF exceeded its authority in attempting to reclassify bump stocks as “machineguns.”. In doing so, the Court turned to the text of the law.
- Counsel
- Dhillon Law Group
Jul 2, 2024 · Last week, the conservative-majority Court struck down that ban in Garland v. Cargill, stating the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives overstepped its authority in classifying bump stocks as machine guns.
Jun 20, 2024 · Garland v. Cargill (No. 22-976) , in which the 6-3 conservative majority held that the Trump-administration ATF exceeded its statutory authority by banning bumpstocks, concluding that such devices do not meet the statutory definition of a “machinegun.”
Jul 2, 2024 · Case: Garland v. Cargill. What happened: The court ruled 6-3 that bump stocks, devices that turn a semi-automatic weapon into something closer to a machine gun, are legal. The decision overturned...
