Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Beyond a Reasonable Doubt is a 1956 American film noir legal drama directed by Fritz Lang and written by Douglas Morrow. The film stars Dana Andrews, Joan Fontaine, Sidney Blackmer, and Arthur Franz. It was Lang's second film for producer Bert E. Friedlob, [3] and the last American film he directed.

  2. Bert E. was a producer, known for The Steel Trap (1952), While the City Sleeps (1956) and The Star (1952). Bert E. was married to Eleanor Parker , Jeanette Loff and Harriet Beatrice Annenberg. Bert E. died on 7 October 1956 in Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Producer, Additional Crew
    • October 18, 1906
    • Bert E. Friedlob
    • October 7, 1956
  3. Producer: The Steel Trap. Bert E. Friedlob was born on 18 October 1906 in Peoria, Illinois, USA. Bert E. was a producer, known for The Steel Trap (1952), While the City Sleeps (1956) and The Star (1952). Bert E. was married to Eleanor Parker, Jeanette Loff and Harriet Beatrice Annenberg.

    • October 18, 1906
    • October 7, 1956
  4. In September 1955, however, Hollywood Reporter announced that Bert Friedlob had purchased Morrow's original story for his newly formed independent production company, Bert Friedlob Productions. On March 28, 1956, Hollywood Reporter reported that Friedlob had created his company in order to distinguish between his California and New York interests.

    • Fritz Lang, Maxwell Henry
    • Dana Andrews
  5. The film was based on the Charles Einstein novel Bloody Spur, which had been optioned by the producer Bert Fiedlob. The script was originally known as News is Made at Night. It was made for United Artists. The city in the film is supposed to be New York, but the film was shot in Los Angeles.

  6. Released Sep 13, 1956 1h 20m Mystery & Thriller. Novelist Tom Garrett (Dana Andrews) and publisher Austin Spencer (Sidney Blackmer) intend to show how lawyer Roy Thompson (Philip Bourneuf) has been...

    • (19)
    • Mystery & Thriller
  7. A newspaper publisher, wanting to prove a point about the insufficiency of circumstantial evidence, talks his possible son-in-law Tom into a hoax in an attempt to expose ineptitude of the city’s hard-line district attorney.