Search results
Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a criminal defendant's initial appearance before a magistrate judge, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to restriction, marks the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings that trigger attachment of the ...
Jun 23, 2008 · On June 23, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Constitution’s requirement of a right to counsel in the case of Walter Allen Rothgery v. Gillespie County, Texas.
Mar 12, 2021 · Gillespie County, Texas Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained. Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks...
Jun 29, 2007 · On July 15, 2004, Rothgery sued defendant-appellee Gillespie County under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the county violated his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to counsel by following a policy of denying appointed counsel to arrestees released from jail on bond and by failing to adequately train and monitor those involved in the ...
Rothgery then brought a federal civil rights suit against Gillespie County, Texas (defendant), alleging that the county’s policy of denying appointed counsel to indigent defendants prior to indictment violated his right to counsel.
Mar 17, 2008 · Case opinion for US Supreme Court ROTHGERY v. GILLESPIE COUNTY, TEXAS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Mar 17, 2008 · In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court will clarify when an arrested person's right to counsel attaches. In resolving this issue, the Court must balance an accused person's liberty interests with law enforcement officials' interest in retaining effective investigatory techniques.
