Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.canlii.org › en › ca2013 SCC 71 (CanLII) | Wood v. Schaeffer | CanLII

   www.canlii.org › en › ca

   • Cached

   Dec 19, 2013 · Citation: Wood v. Schaeffer, 2013 SCC 71, [2013] 3 S.C.R. 1053. Date: 20131219. Docket: 34621. Between: Police Constable Kris Wood, Acting Sergeant Mark Pullbrook and Police Constable Graham Seguin. Appellants/Respondents on cross-appeal. and. Ruth Schaeffer, Evelyn Minty, Diane Pinder and Ian Scott, Director of the Special Investigations Unit.

   • 2013 CSC 71

     Wood c. Schaeffer, 2013 CSC 71 (CanLII), [2013] 3 RCS 1053,...

   • 1987 CanLII 81

     Irvine v. Canada (Restrictive Trade Practices Commission),...

2. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Wood_v_SchaefferWood v Schaeffer - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Wood_v_Schaeffer

   • Cached

   Wood v Schaeffer [2] is a significant ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada concerning procedural requirements involving incidents arising from police misconduct. Background [ edit ]

3. decisions.scc-csc.ca › scc-csc › scc-cscWood v. Schaeffer - SCC Cases - Supreme Court of Canada

   decisions.scc-csc.ca › scc-csc › scc-csc

   • Cached

   Access to Court Facilities, Media Briefings and Lock-ups. Access to Court Documents, Photographs and Recordings. This page contains a form to search the Supreme Court of Canada case information database. You can search by the SCC 5-digit case number, by name or word in the style of cause, or by file number from the appeal court.

4. www.scc-csc.ca › case-dossier › infoSCC Case Information - Summary - 34621 - Supreme Court of Canada

   www.scc-csc.ca › case-dossier › info

   • Cached

   Police Constable Kris Wood, et al. v. Ruth Schaeffer, et al. (Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave) Keywords. None. Summary. Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court.

5. falconers.ca › casestudy › schaeffer-v-wood-et-alSchaeffer v. Wood et al. - Falconers LLP

   falconers.ca › casestudy › schaeffer-v-wood-et-al

   • Cached

   Jun 23, 2010 · Schaeffer v. Wood et al. Julian Falconer of Falconers LLP represented the Schaeffer and Minty families in an Application against police officers involved in the death of their family members. The Application sought judicial interpretation of various provisions of the Police Services Act to determine whether the conduct of the involved police ...

6. ca.vlex.com › vid › schaeffer-v-wood-680896649Schaeffer et al. v. Wood et al., (2013) 312 O.A.C. 1 (SCC) - vLex

   ca.vlex.com › vid › schaeffer-v-wood-680896649

   • Cached

   Dec 19, 2013 · Schaeffer v. Wood (2013), 312 O.A.C. 1 (SCC) ... Police officers involved in two fatal shootings were subject to investigation by the Special Investigations Unit (SIU ...

7. People also ask

   Who was involved in Schaeffer v Wood?

   • Schaeffer v. Wood et al. - Falconers LLP Schaeffer v. Wood et al. Julian Falconer of Falconers LLP represented the Schaeffer and Minty families in an Application against police officers involved in the death of their family members.

   Schaeffer v. Wood et al. - Falconers LLP

   falconers.ca/casestudy/schaeffer-v-wood-et-al/

   See all results for this question

   What is Schaeffer v Wood?

   • APPEAL and CROSS‑APPEAL from Schaeffer v. Wood, 2011 ONCA 716 (15 November 2011), setting aside Schaeffer v. Woods, 2010 ONSC 3647 (23 June 2010) Wood v Schaeffer is a significant ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada concerning procedural requirements involving incidents arising from police misconduct.

   Wood v Schaeffer - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_v_Schaeffer

   See all results for this question

   What are the facts of the Schaeffer investigation?

   • In this regard, the facts of the Schaeffer investigation are especially troubling. Both officers completed their notes only after their lawyer had reviewed their draft notes. Neither officer ever provided their original draft notes, which, of course, were shielded behind solicitor-client privilege, to the SIU.

   2013 SCC 71 (CanLII) | Wood v. Schaeffer | CanLII

   www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2013/2013scc71/2013scc71.html

   See all results for this question

   How did the police detain Mr Schaeffer?

   • When they arrived at the peninsula, the officers approached Mr. Schaeffer, questioned him, and attempted to detain him. According to the officers, Mr. Schaeffer physically resisted and pulled a knife out of his pocket. Both officers retreated as Mr. Schaeffer advanced towards them. Mr. Schaeffer did not comply with commands to drop the knife.

   2013 SCC 71 (CanLII) | Wood v. Schaeffer | CanLII

   www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2013/2013scc71/2013scc71.html

   See all results for this question

   Why did CST wood commit a criminal offence?

   • Wood had committed a criminal offence because he could not “place sufficient reliance on the information provided by Cst Wood or A/Sgt Pullbrook to decide what probably happened” (A.R., vol. III, at p. 516). The SIU Director expressed specific concern over the manner in which Cst. Wood and Acting Sgt. Pullbrook completed their notes.

   2013 SCC 71 (CanLII) | Wood v. Schaeffer | CanLII

   www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2013/2013scc71/2013scc71.html

   See all results for this question

   Who were the interveners in the Canadian civil liberties association case?

   • Wendy J. Wagner and Ryan W. Kennedy, for the intervener the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. Andrew I. Nathanson and Gavin R. Cameron, for the intervener the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. Christa D. Big Canoe and Emily R. Hill, for the intervener the Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto Inc.

   2013 SCC 71 (CanLII) | Wood v. Schaeffer | CanLII

   www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2013/2013scc71/2013scc71.html

   See all results for this question

8. www.cpac.ca › supreme-court-hearings › episodePolice Constable Kris Wood, et al. v. Ruth Schaeffer, et al.

   www.cpac.ca › supreme-court-hearings › episode

   • Cached

   Police Constable Kris Wood, et al. v. Ruth Schaeffer, et al. (April 19, 2013)Case # 34621In June 2009, the Special Investigations Unit was called upon to investigate the conduct of police officers. The investigation pertained to two separate incidents which involved the death of civilians at the hands of police. In both cases, the subject officer and the witness officers were instructed not to ...