Search results
In February 2020 the BSCC released the CalVIP Cohort 3 RFP to California cities disproportionately impacted by violence (as defined by AB 1603) and the community-based organizations (CBO) that serve them. The BSCC awarded grant funds to 13 large cities (population greater than 40,000), 6 small cities (population 40,000 or less) and 14 CBOs.
Differences in homicide counts and rates by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and use of a firearm are examined. These findings can help identify disproportionately affected populations and guide the development and implementation of data-driven strategies to prevent death and injury in California.
Mar 31, 2020 · Eligibility. Cities identified as disproportionately impacted by violence and the community-based organizations that serve the residents of those cities (see Table 1 on page 6 of the RFP) are eligible to apply for up to $1.5 million.
Data are an essential part of the dialogue around violence prevention and can guide in the development of sustainable prevention strategies. This data brief is focused on a broad overview of the prevalence and burden of homicides and suicides in California.
- 3MB
- 36
There were 6,902 violent deaths to Californians in 2020. Thirty-six percent of these were due to homicide (2,480), including the 2% legal intervention deaths (deaths that result from law enforcement acting in the line of duty). The homicide rate was 6.2 deaths per 100,000 population.
The Cohort 3 CalVIP Grant program for funding period October 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023 requires a 3-year Local Evaluation Report (LER) to identify whether the project “worked” in terms of achieving its goals and objectives. The LER will be the documentation of activities completed with the support of grant funds.
People also ask
Is 2021 a preliminary homicide rate?
Does California have a violence prevention initiative?
How many homicides are caused by firearms in California in 2021?
What is California comprehensive death files (CCDF) data for 2021?
Jun 9, 2022 · The programs selected for funding tackle gun violence by concentrating on prevention efforts. For example, an analysis found that in Oakland, less than 1 percent of the city’s population was responsible for the majority of homicides.
