Search results
Aug 4, 2016 · Furnace Oil – Current weekly consumer prices for furnace oil in 30 Canadian cities plus the average Canada price. Prices by city; Prices by year; All fuels in a combined price chart; Wholesale Prices
Mar 25, 2019 · The current price of heating oil in Canada is CAD 1.51 per liter or USD 1.10 per liter. The latest update was on 01-Jul-2024. We show heating oil price data for Canada from 2019-03-25 to 2024-07-01.
Jan 25, 2024 · Since early 2023, through OHPA, the Government of Canada has been providing an upfront, advance payment of up to $10,000 to low-to-median-income Canadian households that use home heating oil to help them cover the cost of purchasing and installing an eligible heat pump system.
Oct 6, 2022 · Furnace oil has been sitting around $1.50 to slightly over $1.60 per litre, give or take, for the past few months, down from a high of slightly over $2 per litre earlier this year. In early October...
- Minister's message
- On this page
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Part 1 – Fuel charge
- 3. Part 2 – Output-Based Pricing System
- 4. Additional information
- Footnotes
I am pleased to present the third Annual Report on the administration of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act.
A price on carbon pollution, coupled with an approach that returns all proceeds back to their jurisdiction of origin, provides an affordable incentive to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; stimulate investments in clean innovation; and encourage a competitive, prosperous, and resilient economy. It creates a financial incentive for businesses and households to decide for themselves how best to reduce their emissions.
I have heard directly from CEOs who say that pollution pricing is foundational to major job-creating investments in clean energy projects in Canada. And with many Canadian households now receiving direct, quarterly Climate Action Incentive payments, the federal pollution pricing system is actually making life more affordable by putting more money back into the pockets of eight out of ten individuals.
Canada's approach to pollution pricing is simple—it ensures it is no longer free to pollute anywhere in Canada. Provinces and territories have the flexibility to design and implement carbon pollution pricing systems that best meet their circumstances while aligning with minimum national stringency standards—the federal benchmark—to ensure systems are comparable and effective at reducing emissions across the country.
Canada strengthened the benchmark criteria in 2021 to ensure all carbon pollution pricing systems will be fair and effective from 2023 onwards. This includes ensuring that carbon markets are functioning well, so that they effectively create an incentive for industries to reduce emissions and innovate, sending a clear carbon price signal across all covered emissions in Canada.
Canada's carbon pricing system for industry—the Output-Based Pricing System—is designed to ensure there is a price incentive for large industrial emitters to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and spur innovation while maintaining international competitiveness and minimizing carbon leakage.
•1. Introduction
•1.1. Pan-Canadian Approach to Pricing Carbon Pollution
•1.2. Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act
•1.3. Where the Act applied during the reporting period
•2. Part 1 – Fuel charge
•2.1. Overview of the federal fuel charge
This third annual report fulfills the Minister of the Environment's obligation, under section 270 of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (GGPPA), to report on the administration of the Act for the previous calendar year.
•For the purposes of this report, the "administrative period" is considered to be from January 1 to December 31, 2021. However, as Part 1 of the Act is administered on a fiscal year basis, this report includes fuel charge data for fiscal year 2021-2022 (i.e. April 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022).
2.1. Overview of the federal fuel charge
Part 1 of GGPPA establishes a fuel charge, which is a regulatory charge on fossil fuels. It is generally paid by fuel producers and fuel distributors in backstop jurisdictions. The federal fuel charge is under the purview of the Minister of Finance and is administered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The fuel charge applies to 21 fossil fuels including gasoline, light fuel oil (e.g., diesel), and natural gas. It also applies to combustible waste, which includes tires and asphalt shingles. On April 1, 2021, the fuel charge rates were updated for the 2021-2022 fiscal year to reflect a carbon pollution price of $40 per tonne of CO2e. As of April 1, 2022, the rates increased to reflect a carbon pollution price of $50 per tonne, and will subsequently increase by $15 per tonne annually from 2023 to 2030, reaching a price of $170 per tonne in 2030. Applying the fuel charge at higher rates over time will help to reduce GHG emissions and support clean growth. It sends a signal to markets and provides an incentive to reduce energy use through conservation and efficiency measures. Table 2 below indicates the rates of federal fuel charge on select fuels from fiscal years 2019-2020 to 2022-2023. Future rate increases are effective as of April 1 of the fuel charge year noted in the table. The rates for gasoline and light fuel oil take into account the average renewable content of these fuels. 2.1.1. Where the fuel charge applied in 2021-2022 During 2021-2022, the federal fuel charge applied in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Yukon and Nunavut, as listed in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the Act. 2.1.2. Registration and timing of payment The Act provides for 12 different types of registrations for the application of the fuel charge. Certain persons (for example, fuel distributors and fuel producers that deliver fuel to other persons in a backstop jurisdiction) must register or may register with the CRA and pay the federal fuel charge to the CRA, as required. Registered persons are generally required to file a monthly return and pay net fuel charge amounts monthly. There are also special rules for the transportation sector. For example, persons that are inter-jurisdictional air carriers, inter-jurisdictional marine carriers, inter-jurisdictional rail carriers and inter-jurisdictional road carriers, such as freight vehicles, that operate in a jurisdiction where the federal backstop applies, are required to register with the CRA. Carriers must calculate fuel use in the backstop jurisdiction and file monthly returns (except for registered road carriers who file quarterly). Depending on where fuel is purchased and used by carriers, they will either have a net fuel charge owing or will be eligible for a refund. Additional information on registration is available on the fuel charge webpage on the Government of Canada website. 2.1.3. Fuel charge relief The purpose of the GGPPA is to reduce GHG emissions by ensuring that carbon pollution pricing applies broadly throughout Canada. At the same time, the Government recognizes that particular groups or sectors have a need for targeted relief from the fuel charge – in particular because of the small number of alternative options they may have in the face of carbon pollution pricing. Generally, fuel charge relief is provided upfront through exemption certificates, when certain conditions are met. Groups eligible for targeted relief include farmers, fishers, greenhouse operators, remote power plant operators, and users of aviation fuel in the territories.
2.2. Return of fuel charge proceeds
For this administrative period (2021-2022), the Government of Canada returned fuel charge proceeds as follows: Directly to the governments of those jurisdictions that chose to adopt the federal system (Yukon and Nunavut) In those jurisdictions that did not meet the federal benchmark (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario): The bulk of the fuel charge proceeds were returned directly to individuals and families through Climate Action Incentive payments (see 2.2.1). A portion of the remainder of the fuel charge proceeds for 2019-2020 was returned through federal programming (see 2.3). A portion of the remainder was returned to farming businesses operating in these jurisdictions via a refundable tax credit, starting for the 2021-2022 fuel charge year. It is estimated that farmers would receive $100 million in the first year with this amount expected to increase as the price on carbon pollution rises. Information on actual proceeds returned in respect of 2021-2022 is expected to be included in the 2022 annual report. 2.2.1. Climate Action Incentive payments For the 2021-2022 fuel charge year, which began in April 2021, eligible residents of Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta could claim a refundable tax credit known as a Climate Action Incentive (CAI) payment for their family through their 2020 personal income tax returns (typically filed in early 2021). The announcement in Budget 2021: A Recovery Plan for Jobs, Growth, and Resilience, and further details provided in the Economic and Fiscal Update 2021, indicated the Government would deliver CAI payments on a quarterly basis starting in July 2022. This approach returns fuel charge proceeds to individuals and families on a regular basis throughout the year. CAI payment amounts are based on family composition and province of residence. Table 3 below contains the CAI payment amounts for the payments made available in respect of the 2021-2022 fuel charge year. Although not included in these amounts, a 10 percent supplement was available to eligible individuals and families residing in small or rural communities, in recognition of their increased energy needs and reduced access to clean transportation options. Notes: Payments made to individuals and families vary by province of residence given that different levels of proceeds are generated in each affected jurisdiction, and the impacts of carbon pollution pricing on households differ. These variations are an outcome of the different types and quantities of fuels consumed in different provinces. These amounts do not include the 10 percent supplement for eligible residents of small and rural communities. Most households receive more in CAI payments than their increased costs resulting from the federal carbon pollution pricing system. For example, in 2021, the estimated average cost impact per household of the federal system in Ontario was $439, while the average CAI payment per household was $592. In Alberta, the average cost per household was $598 and the average CAI payment was $953. In Manitoba, these amounts were $462 and $705, respectively, and in Saskatchewan, they were $720 and $969. Independent analyses have confirmed that most households received more in payments than they face in direct costs due to carbon pollution pricing, including a 2021 analysis by the Smart Prosperity Institute, and 2022 analyses by the Parliamentary Budget Officer (A Distributional Analysis of Federal Carbon Pricing under a Healthy Environment and a Healthy Economy). CAI payment amounts are specified in advance of the fuel charge year, and reflect increases in the price on carbon pollution under the federal backstop system, updated estimates of proceeds being generated in each jurisdiction, and adjustments from previous years. Because CAI payments are specified in advance of the related fuel charge year, the amounts being returned to individuals and families through these payments are based on estimated proceeds. As actual proceeds and the total amount of proceeds returned in a specific jurisdiction through CAI payments may differ from estimated levels, adjustments are made through changes in future CAI payment amounts. This ensures that direct proceeds are fully returned to the jurisdiction of origin over time.
2.3. Fuel charge proceeds assessed and returned by jurisdiction
This report covers the fuel charge reporting periods from April 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 for Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Yukon, and Nunavut. Fuel charge proceeds are reported on a net basis to account for rebates claimed and returned to persons registered under Division 4 of the Act. To ensure accountability, the Government of Canada includes annual updates in this report on the direct proceeds and disbursements realized from the federal carbon pollution pricing system in respect of each province and territory where it applies. Any variance between the actual proceeds originating in a given jurisdiction and the amount of proceeds returned to that jurisdiction will be addressed through changes in future payment amounts to that jurisdiction. This transparent process ensures that direct proceeds are fully returned to the jurisdiction of origin over time. 2.3.1. Jurisdictions with proceeds returned via CAI payments and federal programming Table 4 summarizes fuel charge proceeds assessed and returned in each of the four provinces (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario) that did not meet the federal benchmark during the 2021-2022 fuel charge year. The bulk of the proceeds assessed in 2021-2022 was returned through CAI payments, which were claimed by individuals filing their 2020 personal income tax returns. For example, in Ontario, while $3.49 billion in proceeds was assessed in 2021-2022, $3.05 billion was also returned to residents of Ontario through CAI payments. Net proceeds in each province represent the difference between proceeds assessed and proceeds returned (or to be returned). Over time, these differences are corrected through adjustments to future CAI payment amounts in each province, such that all proceeds are returned to the jurisdiction of origin. Notes: Totals may not add up due to rounding. 1 These amounts for small- and medium-sized businesses, farmers and Indigenous groups are expected to be disbursed through federal mechanisms. The amounts in respect of 2021-2022 include the Return of Fuel Charge Proceeds to Farmers Tax Credit; actual amounts will only be known following the first full year of implementation and will be included in a future report. 2 Net carry-forward amounts are adjustments to prior years' net amounts, due to late filings for those years, and reassessments pertaining to those years, which affect both fuel charges collected and CAI payment amounts. For Ontario, net carry-forward amounts are -$14 million (2019-20) and -$77 million (2020-2021). For Manitoba, net carry-forward amounts are $0 million (2019-2020) and -$6 million (2020-2021). For Saskatchewan, net carry-forward amounts are -$1 million (2019-2020) and -$7 million (2020-2021). For Alberta, net carry-forward amounts are $2 million (2019-2020) and $24 million (2020-2021). 3 Computed by adding together the net carry-forward amounts for 2021-2022 and the net carry-forward amounts from prior years in each province. These balances were used in the setting of quarterly CAI benefit payments for 2023-2024. Beginning in 2020-2021, the federal fuel charge no longer applied in New Brunswick, and is therefore not reported in Table 4 above. With respect to the previous fuel charge year (2019-2020), the remaining balance is an over-distribution of $0.12 million, based on financial information as of May 31, 2022 (see Table 5). This negative balance is due to revised financial information reassessments of CAI payments and fuel charge proceeds for the 2019-2020 fuel charge year. Notes: Amounts of proceeds assessed and CAI payments are based on financial reporting as of May 31, 2021 and are subject to further change in the future due to reassessments of fuel charge or personal income tax returns. All amounts relate to proceeds collected and returned in respect of the 2019-2020 fuel charge year. Totals may not add up due to rounding. Table 6 summarizes proceeds returned through federal programming that are described in detail in section 2.4. In the case of Alberta, the fuel charge was not in place for most of the 2019-2020 year, so 2019-2020 proceeds were not returned to Alberta under this suite of programs. Notes: The Returned row indicates total spending that occurred in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021. The Specified row reflects the specifications of the Minister of Finance announced on May 21, 2021. Totals may not add up due to rounding. 1 Returned under the Climate Action Incentive Fund program. 2 Returned under the Energy Manager Program and the Clean Energy for Rural and Remote Communities Program. 3 Returned under the Indigenous Community-Based Climate Monitoring Program. 4 Returned under the Indigenous Capital Facilities and Maintenance Program and the First Nations Infrastructure Fund. 5 The fuel charge was not in place in Alberta for most of the 2019-2020 year, so 2019-2020 proceeds were not returned to Alberta under this suite of programs. Not all 2019-2020 fuel charge proceeds allocated to be returned through federal programming have been returned to jurisdictions (see bottom of Table 6, approximately $122 million). These outstanding proceeds, as well as a portion of those from 2020-2021 onward, will be returned through ECCC's Fuel Charge Proceeds Return Program (FCPRP) to support small- and medium-sized enterprises in emission-intensive, trade-exposed sectors (see Table 7). The table below sets out the specified amounts available to be returned to small- and medium-sized businesses through the FCPRP. Notes: The table reflects the specification of the Minister of Finance announced on November 22, 2022. Totals may not add up due to rounding. 1 This column includes the remaining 2019-2020 proceeds that have not yet been disbursed through previous federal programming. In 2020, the Government of Canada committed to return 1% of federal fuel charge proceeds to Indigenous communities in jurisdictions where federal programming is in effect. Environment and Climate Change Canada is currently working with Indigenous partners in Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, and Saskatchewan to co-develop solutions for returning 1% of proceeds collected from 2020-2021 to 2022-2023. The proceeds will be returned once co-development activities have concluded. 2.3.2. Jurisdictions with proceeds returned directly to government Table 8 summarizes the net fuel charge proceeds assessed and returned to the territorial governments of Yukon and Nunavut for the 2021-2022 fuel charge year. Notes: Amounts of proceeds assessed are based on financial reporting as of May 31, 2022.
3.1. Overview of the Output-Based Pricing System
The federal OBPS is designed to put a price on carbon pollution from industry while mitigating carbon leakage and adverse competitiveness impacts risks. The system creates a strong financial incentive for all covered industrial facilities to improve their performance and reduce their emissions intensity and for strong performers to continue to improve. The Output-Based Pricing System Regulations (OBPS Regulations), which establish the OBPS, were published in the Canada Gazette Part II on July 10, 2019. The federal OBPS sets emissions-intensity standards, known as output-based standards, for a wide range of industrial activities on an emissions per-unit of output basis. Covered facilities are those located in provinces and territories where the federal OBPS applies and that meet the criteria in the OBPS Regulations, or have been designated upon request as a covered facility by the Minister. Each covered facility calculates an annual emissions limit based on its level of production and the relevant output-based standard(s). Facilities that emit less than their annual limit earn surplus credits that they can sell, transfer, or hold for future use. Facilities with emissions above their annual limit must provide compensation by a prescribed deadline for each tonne of GHG emissions above their limit, by using one or a combination of the following options: paying the carbon pollution price to the government via an excess emissions charge; or remitting compliance units that may either be surplus credits, federal offset credits (see section 3.1.6), or recognized units. By allowing facilities to generate and trade surplus credits for reducing their emissions below the limit, the OBPS ensures that the incentive to reduce emissions created by the carbon pollution price applies to every tonne of emissions from industrial facilities. By only applying a compliance obligation on emissions above a facility's annual limit, the OBPS limits overall costs to help facilities maintain their international competitiveness and reduce the risk of carbon leakage. 3.1.1. Where the OBPS applied in 2021 During 2021, the OBPS applied in the backstop jurisdictions of Manitoba, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Yukon, Nunavut and partially in Saskatchewan. New Brunswick was removed from Part 2 of Schedule 1 as of January 1, 2021, and Ontario as of January 1, 2022 because they had a carbon pollution pricing system in place that aligned with the benchmark. The OBPS is mandatory for facilities in backstop jurisdictions that are primarily engaged in the industrial activities listed in Schedule 1 to the OBPS Regulations and that emit 50kt or more of CO2e per year. Persons responsible for facilities located in a backstop jurisdiction that do not meet the criteria outlined in the OBPS Regulations may apply to have the facility designated as a covered facility under the OBPS (that is "opt-in"). These applications are assessed on their merits on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the considerations in the policy regarding Voluntary Participation in the OBPS. To be considered, these facilities should emit or, in certain circumstances, expect to emit, 10kt or more of CO2e per year. Facilities should also either be carrying out an activity for which an output-based standard is prescribed in the OBPS Regulations or be from a sector at risk of carbon leakage and competitiveness impacts from carbon pollution pricing. Facilities that voluntarily opt-in and are then covered by Part 2 of the Act, may apply to be exempted from the fuel charge under Part 1. As of December 31, 2021, there were 246 facilities registered under the OBPS, which includes 123 mandatory covered facilities and 123 opt in facilities. Of the opt in facilities, 84 opted in under Part 1 of the Voluntary Participation Policy; and 39 opted in under Part 2 of the Voluntary Participation Policy (see Figure 1). Part 1 of this policy applies to facilities that carry out an activity for which an output-based standard (OBS) has been set out in Column 1 of Schedule 1 to the OBPS Regulations. Part 2 enables additional facilities to apply to be included in the OBPS if they are in sectors at risk of competitiveness impacts and carbon leakage from the carbon pollution price. For these facilities the OBS is calculated in accordance with section 37 of the OBPS Regulations. Figure 2: Number of registered facilities by type as of December 31, 2021 Long description This figure is a pie chart that indicates the percentage of registered facilities by three types: Mandatory covered facilities, voluntary participation Part 1, and Voluntary participation Part 2. The table below indicates the number of facilities in each type, as well as the percentage of the total represented by those facilities. Regulatory amendments On September 1, 2021, the Regulations Amending the Output-Based Pricing System Regulations were published in the Canada Gazette, Part II. These amendments improve clarity and implementation of the OBPS Regulations and prepare the federal OBPS for transitions to provincial carbon pollution pricing systems. Also on September 1, 2021, the Order Amending Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act was published in the Canada Gazette, Part II. This Order removes the name of New Brunswick from Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the GGPPA retroactively to January 1, 2021 and of Ontario as of January 1, 2022. In February 2021, the 2022 Review of the OBPS Regulations was launched with the release of a scoping paper describing the principles and scope for the review. A consultation paper was published in December 2021 to describe and engage stakeholders on ECCC's key proposed amendments to the OBPS Regulations. 3.1.2. Facility reporting Compliance with the OBPS Regulations is assessed on the basis of a compliance period. Section 173 of the GGPPA requires persons responsible for mandatory facilities to submit an annual report to the Minister for each compliance period. This annual report includes the OBPS compliance period for mandatory facilities that started on January 1, 2021 and ended on December 31, 2021. For facilities that became covered facilities part way through a calendar year, the compliance period starts on the effective date of registration as an emitter with the CRAFootnote 3, or if located in Prince Edward Island, on the date of registration as a covered facility under the GGPPA. A person responsible for a covered facility is required to quantify the facility's GHG emissions and production during each compliance period. Their annual report must include: the facility's annual emissions limit, the total GHG emissions and production, and the compensation the facility owes or the number of surplus credits the facility has generated. Annual reports must be verified by an independent third-party verifier and accompanied by a verification report. Verification requirements, including accreditation requirements, verification procedures, and the content of the verification report, are included in the OBPS Regulations. Annual reports accompanied by verification reports are due on or before June 1 of the calendar year following the compliance period for which the annual report is prepared. There was a 75% compliance rate by OBPS facilities for reporting by the annual reporting deadline in the first compliance period (2019), based on those received by the amended deadline of October 1, 2020. ECCC engaged with persons responsible for covered facilities to promote compliance with the reporting requirements. As a result of these efforts all 2019 annual reports were received before the amended regular-rate compensation deadline of April 15, 2021. There was an 82% compliance rate by OBPS facilities for reporting by the annual reporting deadline in the second compliance period (2020), based on those received by the regular deadline of June 1, 2021. ECCC engaged with persons responsible for covered facilities to promote compliance with the reporting requirements. Under section 176 of the GGPPA, if a person responsible for a covered facility becomes aware of an error or omission within five years after submitting an annual report, they must notify the Minister. Under section 62 of the OBPS Regulations, they must then submit a corrected report within 60 days (if the error or omission would not have constituted a material discrepancy if it had been identified during the verification of the annual report) or a corrected report and a verification report within 90 days (if the error or omission would have constituted a material discrepancy). Section 177 of the GGPPA also gives the Minister the discretionary authority to request a corrected report within five years after the submission of an annual report if he is of the opinion that there is an error or omission. The Minister may also require verification of the corrected report. The OBPS Regulations set out timelines of 60 or 90 days, depending on whether the Minister requests the verification of the corrected report. As of March 31, 2022, the Minister has requested corrections to 7 annual reports for the 2019 compliance period, 0 reports for the 2020 compliance period and 0 for the 2021 compliance period. Corrections to reports will result in revisions to OBPS reported statistics over time, including total compensation owed, surplus credits issued, and how compensation is provided. 3.1.3. Compensation Under the OBPS, persons responsible for covered facilities are required to provide compensation for GHG emissions that exceed the facility's annual emissions limit. Compensation is to be provided by December 15 of the calendar year in which the related annual report must be submitted, using the on-line Credit and Tracking System (CATS). This is the regular-rate compensation deadline. Compensation is to be provided at the regular rate of the excess emissions charge for the compliance period in question or by remitting one compliance unit for each tonne of CO2e emitted in excess of the facility's annual emissions limit. The regular rate is set at the carbon pollution price for the given year. If compensation is not provided in full by the regular-rate compensation deadline of December 15, persons responsible for covered facilities must provide compensation by the increased-rate compensation deadline of February 15 of the calendar year following the regular-rate compensation deadline (that is, the second calendar year following the compliance period) at the increased rate. The GGPPA sets the increased-rate compensation at four times the regular rate. Failing to provide compensation by the increased-rate compensation deadline is an offence under the Act and is also a violation that can proceed under the Environmental Violations Administrative Monetary Penalties Act (EVAMPA). As indicated above, the regular-rate compensation deadline for the 2019 compliance period was postponed to April 15, 2021 and the increased-rate compensation deadline postponed to June 15, 2021. The regular-rate compensation deadline for the 2020 compliance period was December 15, 2021 and the increased-rate compensation deadline was February 15, 2022. For the 2020 compliance periodFootnote 4, the total compensation owed represented 8 526 373 tonnes of CO2e from 199 covered facilities. (Table 12) Compliance units can include: surplus credits, eligible offset credits from an existing provincial system (recognized units), or federal offset credits (Canada's Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit System launched June 8, 2022 – further information provided in section 3.1.6). 3.1.4. Surplus credits In accordance with the GGPPA and the OBPS Regulations, the Minister of the Environment will issue surplus credits, in the department's on-line CATS to persons responsible for covered facilities whose GHG emissions are lower than their facility's emissions limit for a given compliance period. The persons responsible can sell their surplus credits or bank them for future use or sale. For the 2020 compliance periodFootnote 4, ECCC issued in January 2021 a total of 1 102 363 CO2e tonnes of surplus credits to 43 covered facilities with the quantity of surplus credits issued per facility ranging from 50 tonnes of CO2e to 169 752 tonnes of CO2e. (Table 11) 3.1.5. Recognized units Recognized units are eligible offset credits issued by a provincial or territorial offset system that have been recognized by ECCC as eligible for use as compensation for excess emissions under the federal OBPS. Using recognized units is a substitute for direct emissions reductions by facilities covered by the OBPS Regulations and provides an opportunity to reduce the cost of compensation while still reducing GHG emissions in Canada. Only provincial or territorial offset programs and protocols that meet the eligibility criteria in the OBPS Regulations will be included on the List of Recognized Offset Programs and Protocols for the Federal OBPS (the List). An arrangement for the tracking and use of provincial or territorial offset credits must be established between ECCC and the province or territory before the program or any of its protocols can be recognized and appear on the List. The List was released in August 2020 and will be updated from time to time, as provinces and territories put in place new eligible protocols or update existing ones, and when new provincial or territorial systems are established. The list currently includes the Alberta Emission Offset System and five of its 18 protocols, and the British Columbia Greenhouse Gas Emission Offset System. No recognized units were used as compensation for the 2020 compliance year. 3.1.6. Federal GHG offset credits Canada's GHG Offset Credit System encourages cost-effective, voluntary emissions reductions and removals in Canada from activities not covered by legal requirements or carbon pollution pricing. It provides expanded financial incentives to reduce carbon pollution across the economy. It will generate new economic opportunities in sectors such as agriculture, forestry and waste. Federal offset credits can be used by persons responsible for covered facilities under the OBPS as compensation for excess emissions, increasing compliance flexibility and potentially reducing the cost of compliance. In addition, other groups, including governments and businesses, can use offset credits to meet internal climate objectives. The GHG Offset Credit System pursuant to Part 2 of GGPPA consists of three main elements: regulations to implement the operational aspects of the system; federal offset protocols to establish the methods for quantifying GHG reductions for given project types; and a tracking system to register offset projects, issue and track offset credits, and share key information through a public registry. The proposed Greenhouse Gas Offset Credit System Regulations (Canada) were published in the Canada Gazette Part I on March 6, 2021. Federal offset protocols set out requirements for project implementation and methods for quantifying the GHG emissions reduced or removed from the atmosphere. Only eligible project activities included in a published federal offset protocol will be able to generate federal offset credits in Canada's GHG Offset Credit System. Work to develop federal offset protocols proceeded in parallel, beginning in spring 2021. Two draft protocols were published for a 30-day public consultation period in January 2022, including Landfill Methane Recovery and Destruction and Reducing GHG Emissions from Refrigeration Systems. The Landfill Methane Recovery and Destruction Protocol (final version was published June 2022) will provide opportunities for landfill operators to generate offset credits through the capture and destruction of methane that is not already required. The Reducing GHG Emissions from Refrigeration Systems Protocol provides an incentive to transition away from refrigerants containing hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with high global warming potentials (GWPs) in commercial and industrial refrigeration and air conditioning systems. Once finalized, the federal offset protocols will be listed in the Compendium of Federal Offset Protocols. Other federal offset protocols under development are: Improved Forest Management on Private Lands, Direct Air Carbon Capture and Sequestration, Livestock Feed Management, and Enhanced Soil Organic Carbon. The development of protocols for additional project types will be considered as more information and data become available and as their potential evolves. ECCC will continue to engage with provinces, territories, Indigenous organizations and communities and other stakeholders on the development of federal offset protocols and other aspects of Canada's GHG Offset Credit System. 3.1.7. Compensation amounts The compensation required and received under the OBPS is summarized below for each compliance period. For the 2019 and 2020 compliance periods, more than 90% of compensation was provided in the form of excess emissions charge (EEC) payments. The amount of surplus credits used for compensation was only 3% for the first compliance period of the OBPS but tripled to 9% for the 2020 compliance period.
3.2. OBPS proceeds and return of proceeds (as of January 6, 2023.)
The Government of Canada has committed to returning all proceeds collected under the federal carbon pollution pricing system, including the federal OBPS, back to the jurisdictions of origin. As was first announced in Canada's December 2020 strengthened climate plan, A Healthy Environment and a Healthy Economy, proceeds collected under the federal OBPS are to be returned to jurisdictions to support the implementation of industrial projects, clean technologies and processes that reduce emissions in industrial sectors. The amount of proceeds received by the federal government in excess emissions charge payments under the OBPS for the 2019 and 2020 compliance periods was approximately $164 millionFootnote 4 and $236 millionFootnote 4 respectively. Note: Numbers are rounded to the nearest million. Throughout 2021-2022, the federal government engaged with industry stakeholders and with provinces and territories on the approach to return the proceeds collected under the OBPS to jurisdictions of origin. On February 14, 2022, the Minister of Environment and Climate Change announced the launch of the new Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS) Proceeds Fund. The OBPS Proceeds Fund is comprised of two program streams: the Decarbonization Incentive Program (DIP) and the Future Electricity Fund (FEF). The DIP is a merit-based application program that incentivizes the long-term decarbonization of Canada's industrial sectors by supporting clean technology projects that result in material GHG emissions reductions within most facilities regulated by the OBPS. The FEF stream is designed to support clean electricity projects and/or programs. Proceeds collected from OBPS covered electricity generating facilities (i.e., utilities) are expected to be returned through funding agreements with governments of backstop jurisdictions. An open call for project proposals is not anticipated under the FEF. With a focus on industrial decarbonization and clean energy production, the OBPS Proceeds Fund as a whole supports making Canada's heavy industries cleaner and more efficient as it transitions to a low-carbon economy. Approximately $161.1 million collected from the OBPS for the 2019 compliance period, as well as approximately $230.9 million collected for the 2020 compliance period, are being returned through the new OBPS Proceeds Fund. The amount of proceeds generated under the federal OBPS, and subsequently available through the OBPS Proceeds Fund, will fluctuate over time, and are dependent upon a number of factors, including: jurisdictions exiting the federal system by establishing a similar pricing regime; how many eligible facilities within backstop jurisdictions opt to voluntarily participate in the system; how facilities react to the price signal; and which compensation mechanisms regulatees choose. The following table shows the estimated funding available in each OBPS backstop jurisdiction based on proceeds collected from the 2019 and 2020 compliance years. * Proceeds collected and reported for any given compliance year are subject to change and may be adjusted to allow for the correction of reporting errors under the OBPS (if any). * Proceeds collected and reported for any given compliance year are subject to change and may be adjusted to allow for the correction of reporting errors under the OBPS (if any).
3.3. OBPS compliance promotion and enforcement
ECCC continues to proactively engage with OBPS regulatees, facilities wishing to opt in to the OBPS, and representative industry associations to support awareness and understanding of the OBPS regulatory requirements, policy and guidance. 3.3.1. Compliance promotion In 2021, ECCC updated relevant web pages and directly emailed regulated entities regarding: the launch of the CATS and process for registration; compensation deadlines for both the 2019 and 2020 compliance periods; the opening of the reporting module for the 2020 compliance period in ECCC's Single Window System (spring); the 2020 compliance period reporting deadline; deadlines and processes related to the use of Alberta offset emission credits as recognized units; corrected report reporting and compensation deadlines; regulatory amendments that stood down the federal OBPS in Ontario and New Brunswick. In addition to website and email outreach, ECCC contacted specific regulated entities directly by phone regarding the impact of standing down the federal OBPS on surplus credit validity. 3.3.2. Enforcement activities For the time period covered by this report, no enforcement activities were conducted. In 2021, Enforcement Branch designated and trained enforcement officers under GGPPA.
For more information about GGPPA, please contact:
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Ottawa ON K1A 0H3
Email: tarificationducarbone-carbonpricing@ec.gc.ca
Footnote 1
In Saskatchewan, the federal OBPS applied only to electricity generation and natural gas transmission pipelines in 2021.
Return to footnote1 Referrer
Footnote 2
This amount was adjusted to $213 million after $5 million was reallocated and returned directly to New Brunswick by the Minister of National Revenue.
Return to footnote2 Referrer
Energy Fact Book. has provided a solid foundation for Canadians to understand and discuss important developments across the energy sector. A significant milestone in Canadian energy information was recently achieved with the launch of the Canadian Center for Energy Information (CCEI).
People also ask
How much does furnace oil cost in Canada?
How much does furnace oil cost in 2021?
How much does heating oil cost in Canada?
How much is furnace oil per litre?
PRICES Table 10.7 Home heating oil, average retail price by city (taxes included) St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador. Charlottetown-Summerside, Prince Edward Island. Halifax, Nova Scotia. Saint John, New Brunswick. Québec, Québec. Montréal, Québec.
