Search results
Haicheng Zhao is a regular faculty at Xiamen University, Department of Philosophy. They are interested in Epistemology, Metaphysics, and Philosophy of Mind.
Revisiting Amodal Completion and Knowledge. Haicheng Zhao - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (2):847-856. In a recent paper, Helton and Nanay, 415–423, 2019) present a new argument against two modal accounts of knowledge—safety and sensitivity. Their argument is based on the phenomenon of amodal completion.
It is argued that this dilemma poses a threat for a number of safety principles from the recent literature. In the end, I draw implications of my arguments for the debate between robust and anti-luck virtue epistemologies.
- Haicheng Zhao
- 2021
赵海丞，男，吉林省吉林市人。 本、硕分别毕业于北京师范大学（2013.7）和复旦大学（2016.6）。 2020年6月于美国圣路易斯大学哲学系获哲学博士学位（博士论文题目：Better Virtuous Than Safe—A Study on the Safety Principle in Epistemology; 导师：John Greco）。 现为厦门大学哲学系副教授。...
Haicheng Zhao. Synthese 197 (8):3261-3278 ( 2020 ) Copy BIBTEX. Abstract. The safety principle is the view that, roughly, if one knows that p, p could not easily have been false. It is common for safety theorists to relativize safety to belief-formation methods.
- Haicheng Zhao
- 2020
List of philosophical publications by Haicheng Zhao (Xiamen University), including "Knowledge without safety", "Reliability, Accessibility, and Justified Credence", and "Inductive knowledge and lotteries: Could one explain both ‘safely’?".
Jun 6, 2024 · I then offer a systematic explanation of why it is the safety account—the main competitor of sensitivity—that picks out a more suitable set of possibilities. A consequence of this comparison is that the safety account delivers an overall more satisfying reply to the skeptic than sensitivity does.
