Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Mar 28, 2024 · In this review, we identified two key types of individual differences that relate to interpersonal emotion regulation effectiveness: cognitive abilities and personality traits.

    • 28 March 2024
    • 18, Issue4
  2. We investigated how the Big Five traits predict individual differences in five theoretically important emotion regulation goals that are commonly pursued – pro-hedonic, contra-hedonic, performance, pro-social, and impression management.

  3. Feb 9, 2023 · Given the strong evidence that the traits of extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism are the most salient in explaining individual differences in intrapersonal emotion regulation (e.g., see the review of Hughes et al. ), we focus on these traits in our study.

    • Robin Wickett, Nils Muhlert, Karen Niven
    • 2023/02
    • 10.3390/ijerph20043073
  4. Feb 1, 2020 · In doing so, we document evidence concerning the relationships between personality traits and three key stages of emotion regulation, namely, identification (i.e., choosing which emotions...

  5. Abstract. Where do individual differences in emotion regulation come from? This review examines theoretical and empirical evidence describing the role that personality traits play in shaping individuals’ intrapersonal and interpersonal regulation styles.

    • David J. Hughes, Ioannis K. Kratsiotis, Karen Niven, David Holman
    • 2020
  6. Mar 28, 2024 · This paper provides a framework for describing ‘success’ in interpersonal emotion regulation and synthesizes extant theory and research regarding how personality and cognitive ability relate to interpersonal emotion regulation success.

  7. People also ask

  8. Mar 28, 2024 · Specifically, interpersonal emotion regulation is presented as a process of (i) regulation, that (ii) has an affective target, (iii) is deliberate, and (iv) has a social target.