Search results
- Dictionarysignificant/sɪɡˈnɪfɪk(ə)nt/
adjective
- 1. sufficiently great or important to be worthy of attention; noteworthy: "a significant increase in sales" Similar Opposite
- 2. having a particular meaning; indicative of something: "in times of stress her dreams seemed to her especially significant"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
Major Change means any of the following: (1) introduction of a new process, new process equipment, or new regulated substance; (2) any change in safe operating limits; or (3) any alteration in a process, process equipment, or process chemistry that introduces a new hazard or worsens an existing hazard. Login.
One way of viewing significant risk would be something which would have more impact than the control measures necessary to prevent it; so the risk arising from a wet floor (stf, lost-time injury, legal fees, management time all divided by likelihood) would cost more than the act of drying the floor, in this view a wet floor is a significant risk.
Then fine tune your process so that you move significant changes to the next significant baseline rather than upsetting the user by delivering a major change in the increment from R4-8.3 to R4-8.4. It is also important to understand the differences between marketing’s product identification and the development and support team’s identification.
Release management focuses on both the engineering disciplines that must bring a specific project release together along with the management of external dependencies across products that must accompany a release. A key release management topic is to define the term “release”. For the sake of this article, a release is referred to as the ...
Jan 20, 2012 · team is face-to-face conversation.”. To sum up the differences: Traditional requirements focus on system operations with a tendency toward detailed system specification; use cases focus on interactions between the user and the system with a similar tendency of detailed specification; and user stories focus on customer value with a built-in ...
Structural edge barriers can of course be right at the edge, and usually are. The rule-of-thumb for WAH near unprotected edges is that PFPE is required if approaching closer than *about* 2m, i.e. a little more than the distance you could fall if you tripped over something. The distance isn't defined in law, only via the concept of "being able ...
Posted By Martyn Hendrie The regulations define a "user" as "an employee who habitually uses display screen equipment as a significant part of his normal work" The guidance then goes on to describe Definite users as people like: Typists; Data Input operators (e.g call centres); News Editors; Air Traffic Controllers; Graphic Designers; Financial Dealer Possible Users as people like: Banks ...
That leaves a series of say, a dozen potential builds where the problem could have been introduced. The build records could then be used to test halfway back, to narrow the search. This binary search for the bad build could save a lot of test time, especially if it takes significant time or resources to set up the correct build and test.
Define fine-grained promotion-levels that are consumer/role-specific. One can define numerous levels of quality assurance, but the ones that are important enough to represent new milestones in the evolution of a configuration are when that configuration has successfully transitioned to the next-level consumer in the value-chain.
In which case, as you rightly state, the risk assessment would need to be reviewed accordingly. Therefore the insignificant risk would no longer be insignificant, as regardless of how insignificant it may be, if an accident occurred in the future the risk would become resonably forseeable and significant.
