Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.cambridge.org › core › journalsPreferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long ...

   www.cambridge.org › core › journals

   • Cached

   Specifically, we analyze whether Europeans believe that a consensus or majoritarian political system is best for democracy, and how the type of democracy they endorse might be explained by factors related to institutional learning and the position one holds in the political system.

   • Author: Mónica Ferrín, Enrique Hernández

   • Publish Year: 2021

   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 

2. www.tandfonline.com › doi › fullInstitutional design and polarization. Do consensus ...

   www.tandfonline.com › doi › full

   Mar 9, 2022 · More specifically, we hypothesized that the institutional characteristics of consensus democracies (PR electoral systems, oversized coalition governments, multiparty systems, federalism, and bicameralism) would be better suited to deal with polarization than majoritarian institutions.

3. Videos

   • 

     0:31

     youtube.com

     Why Consensus is Important

     Sep 26, 2023

     481 Views

   • 

     52:14

     youtube.com

     23. Democracy and Majority Rule (II)

     Apr 6, 2011

     48.1K Views

   • 

     30:50

     youtube.com

     One Nation One Poll: How To Build Consensus | Will Simultaneous Polls Materialise? | NewsX

     Sep 19, 2024

     4.4K Views

   View all

4. www.tandfonline.com › doi › fullParticipatory developments in majoritarian and consensus ...

   www.tandfonline.com › doi › full

   Jul 17, 2018 · Today, it is often assumed that rules based on majoritarian decision making, i.e., direct democracy, are more in line with the logic of majoritarian democracies—in contrast to highly deliberative societies which are expected to be found more often in consensus democracies.

   • Author: Brigitte Geissel, A.M.B. Michels

   • Publish Year: 2018

5. oxfordre.com › politics › abstractComparative Political Regimes: Consensus and Majoritarian ...

   oxfordre.com › politics › abstract

   • Cached

   The study of democracy today has been influenced heavily by Arend Lijphart’s typology of consensus versus majoritarian democracy. Scholars have applied it to more than 100 countries and sought to demonstrate its impact on no less than 70 dependent variables.

   • Author: Matthijs Bogaards

   • Publish Year: 2017

6. link.springer.com › article › 10Which type of democracy performs best? | Acta Politica - Springer

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Feb 22, 2013 · Consociational democracy combines a fragmented political culture with coalescent elite behavior, while majoritarian democratic systems are characterized by a homogeneous political culture with competitive elite behavior (Lijphart, 1968, p. 38).

   • Author: Renske Doorenspleet, Huib Pellikaan

   • Publish Year: 2013

7. www.researchgate.net › publication › 321756741Comparative Political Regimes: Consensus and Majoritarian ...

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 321756741

   Dec 12, 2017 · The study of democracy today has been influenced heavily by Arend Lijphart’s typology of consensus versus majoritarian democracy. Scholars have applied it to more than 100 countries and sought...

8. People also ask

   Does consensus democracy perform better than majoritarian democracy?

   • find that consensus democracy performs worse than majoritarian democracy. Anderson ( 2001) also showed that central bank independence lowers inflation. Giuliani small countries. superior performance. A good example is Armingeon ( 2002, p. 99), who is critical of more majoritarian type of democracy “is probably neither feasible nor advantageous.”

   Comparative Political Regimes: Consensus and Majoritarian Democracy

   www.researchgate.net/publication/321756741_Comparative_Political_Regimes_Consensus_and_Majoritarian_Democracy

   See all results for this question

   Are majoritarian systems better for Democracy?

   • Those who are part of the political minority, as measured by the fact that they support smaller parties, are more supportive of consensus democracy, while those who vote for large parties tend to think that majoritarian systems are best for democracy.

   Preferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long- and short

   www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/preferences-for-consensus-and-majoritarian-democracy-long-and-shortterm-influences/865BE64CC6B0369D96145514186B84FA

   See all results for this question

   Is a consensus system best for Democracy?

   • Using data from 24 European countries, we find that most citizens believe a consensus system is best for democracy, although there are stark contrasts across Europe in the extent to which individuals endorse this model of democracy.

   Preferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long- and short

   www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/preferences-for-consensus-and-majoritarian-democracy-long-and-shortterm-influences/865BE64CC6B0369D96145514186B84FA

   See all results for this question

   Are preferences about consensus and majoritarian models of democracy more stable?

   • All in all, though, the broader implication of these findings is that preferences about consensus and majoritarian models of democracy will be more stable in long-established democracies, since in these contexts, preferences are anchored to a greater extent by the institutional makeup of each country.

   Preferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long- and short

   www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/preferences-for-consensus-and-majoritarian-democracy-long-and-shortterm-influences/865BE64CC6B0369D96145514186B84FA

   See all results for this question

   Is consociational democracy stronger than consensus democracy?

   • While both forms of democracy are possible in deeply divided countries, consociational democracy is “the stronger medicine” (Lijphart 2008a: 8); consociational democracy demands the inclusion of all important groups, while most consensus democracies only set incentives for cooperative behavior (Armingeon 2011: 555). 6.

   The Four Worlds of Democracy: Commentary on Arend Lijphart

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-15850-1_3

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between consensus and majoritarian political systems?

   • The distinction between consensus and majoritarian political systems constitutes one of the main divides in how democracies are institutionalized (Lijphart, 2012). While the former disperses power among different groups, the latter concentrates it in the hands of the majority.

   Preferences for consensus and majoritarian democracy: long- and short

   www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-political-science-review/article/preferences-for-consensus-and-majoritarian-democracy-long-and-shortterm-influences/865BE64CC6B0369D96145514186B84FA

   See all results for this question

9. link.springer.com › chapter › 10The Four Worlds of Democracy: Commentary on Arend Lijphart’s ...

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   And those worlds of democracy that have proven to perform better (in the sense of Lijphart’s criteria) than majoritarian democracies are the federalist consensus democracies, such as Switzerland and Germany, and the unitary consensus democracies, such as the northern European countries.