Search results
Aug 17, 2015 · It turns out, virtually all authoritative sources agree these rules are nonsense. We can consider the authority of historical texts before the advent of these pop grammar rules. Does historical record show that speakers were breaking these rules before they even existed?
Twenty-first-century grammarians of English might incorporate data derived from any of these sources. That was not necessarily true for their predecessors. However, it is worthwhile keeping in mind that, as Andrew Linn wrote, ‘grammar-writing in the modern age carries its past with it’ (2006: 74).
Sep 22, 2005 · Linguistics defines analytic tools and methods that check the vagueness and inaccuracy of traditional grammar and the idiosyncrasies of literary and journalistic authorities. And it emphasizes the actual facts of usage, language history, and dialect diversity, rather than myths and misconceptions.
Oct 3, 2014 · Steven Pinker—the Harvard cognitive scientist who also chairs the Usage Panel of the American Heritage Dictionary—is not a fan of many of the “rules” one finds in modern guides to grammar and...
Nov 14, 2019 · Traditional grammarians did not rely only on notional criteria, and where they used them, they sometimes did so in a seemingly rather sophisticated manner. Furthermore, structuralists rely less on pure distributionalism than they claim they do.
Jun 17, 2021 · The teaching of grammar has been strongly debated for decades, often with reference to an alleged decline in the 1960s. This article takes a historical perspective on grammar, or knowledge about language, within English Education.
descriptive rules of English grammar, rarely captured in usage guides because this knowl edge is considered too basic and rarely trips up speakers or writers. In sum, descriptive grammatical rules capture the grammatical knowledge that allows speakers to communi cate systematically and meaningfully.
