Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.researchgate.net › publication › 304041208(PDF) Speech Errors: Psycholinguistic Approach - ResearchGate

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 304041208

   Dec 31, 2006 · Substitution errors, being the most prominent, exhibit uniform processing through a replacement on phonemic or higher levels. As for anticipation errors, they prove to be irregular in their ...

   • Help Center

     © 2008-2024 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved. Terms;...

2. www.sfu.ca › ~alderete › pubsSpeech errors and phonological patterns: Insights from ...

   www.sfu.ca › ~alderete › pubs

   In large collections of speech errors, phonological patterns emerge. Speech errors are shaped by phonotactic constraints, markedness, frequency, and phonological representations of prosodic and segmental structure.

3. Videos

   • 

     9:57

     youtube.com

     Denasalization- Phonological Process- Substitution- Practice Exercises with Mrs. G

     May 28, 2020

     470 Views

   • 

     13:45

     youtube.com

     Stopping- Phonological Process- Substitution- Practice Exercises with Mrs. G

     May 28, 2020

     1.1K Views

   • 

     7:32

     youtube.com

     Deaffrication- Phonological Process- Substitution- Practice Exercises with Mrs. G

     May 28, 2020

     837 Views

   View all

4. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articlesA New Corpus of Lexical Substitution and Word Blend Errors ...

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles

   May 18, 2023 · Despite this progress, errors involving the mis-selection of lemmas (i.e., words with syntactic and semantic information but lacking phonological structure) remain elusive. Descriptively, we know that these errors either blend two words (e.g., /Papa, Dad/→ Pad) or substitute one for another meaning-related word, as in /lunch/→ dinner.

   • DOI: 10.5334/joc.278
   • Published: 2023

   • Publication: J Cogn. 2023; 6(1): 26.

5. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articleWhat's an error anyway? Speaker- and listener-centered ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jan 1, 2023 · The mixed error effect is the finding that errors are often both phonologically and semantically related to the target; this includes blend errors (like ‘mainly/mostly’ → ‘monly’; Fromkin, 1971) and word substitutions or exchanges (‘start’ → ‘stop’; Dell, 1986). Two insights come from this observation.

6. link.springer.com › article › 10Constraints Upon Word Substitution Speech Errors

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Semantic errors are primarily sensitive to the properties of the semantic field involved, whereas phonological errors are sensitive to phonological properties of the targets and intrusions. We explore the features of a corpus of naturally occurring word substitution speech errors.

   • Author: Trevor A. Harley, Siobhan B. G. MacAndrew

   • Publish Year: 2001

7. journalofcognition.org › articles › 10A New Corpus of Lexical Substitution and Word Blend Errors ...

   journalofcognition.org › articles › 10

   • Cached

   May 18, 2023 · The existence of synonym and subsumative errors is documented in a larger open access data set that supports a range of new investigations of the semantic structure of lexical substitution and word blend speech errors.

8. People also ask

   Are mixed substitution errors semantic or phonological?

   • In mixed substitution errors the intrusion is both semantically and phonologically related to the target (e.g. 13 and 14). W e find mixed errors far more often McGill, 1978). W e also find similar results in artificially induced speech errors (e.g. (Martin, W eisberg, & Saffran, 1989).

   (PDF) Speech Errors: Psycholinguistic Approach - ResearchGate

   www.researchgate.net/publication/304041208_Speech_Errors_Psycholinguistic_Approach

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between semantic errors and phonological errors?

   • Semantic errors are primarily sensitive to the properties of the semantic field involved, whereas phonological errors are sensitive to phonological properties of the targets and intrusions. Astell, A. J., & Harley, T. A. (1996).

   Constraints Upon Word Substitution Speech Errors

   link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010421724343

   See all results for this question

   Does word frequency affect phonological errors?

   • Words are replaced by more imageable competitors in semantic substitution errors but not in phonological substitution errors. Frequency effects in these errors are complex and the details prove difficult for any model of speech production. We argue that word frequency mainly affects phonological errors.

   Constraints Upon Word Substitution Speech Errors

   link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1010421724343

   See all results for this question

   How do phonological patterns emerge in large collections of speech errors?

   • ABSTRACT. In large collections of speech errors, phonological patterns emerge. Speech errors are shaped by phonotactic constraints, markedness, frequency, and phonological representations of prosodic and segmental structure.

   Speech errors and phonological patterns: Insights from psycholinguistic

   www.sfu.ca/~alderete/pubs/alderete2020_SpeechErrorsPatternsPrepress.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Are speech errors phonologically regular?

   • Perhaps the constraint with the most direct connection to phonology is the phonological regularity effect, according to which speech errors are phonologically regular, i.e., obey language particular phonotactic rules (Stemberger 1983; Wells 1951). Clearly, speech error patterns are rich in phonological patterns.

   Speech errors and phonological patterns: Insights from psycholinguistic

   www.sfu.ca/~alderete/pubs/alderete2020_SpeechErrorsPatternsPrepress.pdf

   See all results for this question

   What is the mixed error effect?

   • The mixed error effect is the finding that errors are often both phonologically and semantically related to the target; this includes blend errors (like ‘mainly/mostly’ → ‘ monly ’; Fromkin, 1971) and word substitutions or exchanges (‘start’ → ‘stop’; Dell, 1986). Two insights come from this observation.

   What's an error anyway? Speaker- and listener-centered approaches to

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079742123000014

   See all results for this question

9. link.springer.com › content › pdfConstraints Upon Word Substitution Speech Errors - Springer

   link.springer.com › content › pdf

   Semantic errors are primarily sensitive to the properties of the semantic field involved, whereas phonological errors are sensitive to phonological properties of the targets and intrusions. KEY WORDS: speech production; speech errors; lexicalization; frequency; imageability.