Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Aug 16, 2017 · An accurate assessment of fidelity, combined with a high degree of fidelity to the intervention, is critical to the reliability, validity, replicability, and scale-up of the results of an intervention research study. However, extant measures of fidelity are infrequently applicable to the program or intervention being studied, and the literature lacks guidance on the specific process of ...

    • Megan Feely, Kristen D. Seay, Paul Lanier, Wendy Auslander, Patricia L. Kohl
    • 2018
  2. Jan 16, 2020 · Although intervention fidelity optimally includes 5 dimensions, only 1 or 2 dimensions of fidelity (eg, adherence, dosage) have been measured in previous intervention research. 3, 21 There is no study measuring all 5 dimensions of intervention fidelity in physical therapy research. Because each dimension is an important aspect of fidelity, optimal fidelity measurement tools should be multi ...

    • Mihee An, Stacey C Dusing, Regina T Harbourne, Susan M Sheridan
    • 2020
  3. May 29, 2021 · Where an intervention cannot be delivered by the same person(s) in all sites, the need to measure fidelity delivery using more onerous methods of observation or recording will depend on the following considerations: difficulty of intervention delivery, training opportunities, likelihood of delivery deviations, and what leeway program deliverers can have to vary/adapt delivery before a ...

    • Liane R Ginsburg, Matthias Hoben, Adam Easterbrook, Ruth A Anderson, Carole A Estabrooks, Peter G No...
    • 2021
  4. Apr 1, 2018 · An accurate assessment of fidelity, combined with a high degree of fidelity to the intervention, is critical to the reliability, validity, replicability, and scale-up of the results of an ...

  5. Four key considerations drive the development of a fidelity tool: (a) identifying aspects of the intervention to be measured (i.e. the core components); (b) determining what mode of data collection will be used for each measure; (c) deciding who will provide fidelity ratings; and (d) specifying how often these ratings will occur (Schoenwald et al., 2011; Swindle et al., 2018).

    • Ashley Givens, Annie Maria Francis, Amy Blank Wilson, Anna Parisi, Jonathan Phillips, Melissa Villod...
    • 10.1007/s10597-021-00777-x
    • 2021
    • 2021/10
  6. Feb 24, 2016 · Specifically we (a) describe the challenges of, and propose a method for, identifying the essential elements of a contextualised intervention (a semi-flexible, theoretically eclectic intervention designed for complex settings); (b) provide a worked example of an approach for critiquing the validity of putative essential elements; and (c) demonstrate how essential elements can be refined during ...

  7. People also ask

  8. Methods: We propose five steps that can be systematically used to develop fidelity checklists for researchers, providers, and participants to measure fidelity and engagement. These steps include the following: (1) reviewing previous measures, (2) analysing intervention components and developing a framework outlining the content of the intervention, (3) developing fidelity checklists and coding ...

  1. People also search for