Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.aamc.org › news › why-do-so-many-americansWhy do so many Americans distrust science? - AAMC

   www.aamc.org › news › why-do-so-many-americans

   • Cached

   May 4, 2022 · The U.S. Surgeon General and the World Health Organization (WHO) have declared that health misinformation is a threat to public health because it leads people to ignore science-based recommendations about behaviors to practice and to avoid.

2. en.unesco.org › inclusivepolicylab › analyticsWhat makes science trustworthy? A guide for the public - UNESCO

   en.unesco.org › inclusivepolicylab › analytics

   Dec 27, 2022 · The trustworthiness of science should not require scientific expertise to assess. Expert Heather Douglas of Michigan State University argues in this think piece that trustworthiness should be based on the presence of expertise, good expert community functioning, and shared values.

3. Videos

   • 

     1:47

     youtube.com

     2-Minute Neuroscience: The Neuron

     Jul 22, 2014

     2M Views

   • 

     2:05

     youtube.com

     2-Minute Neuroscience: Neuroimaging

     Nov 30, 2014

     278.2K Views

   • 

     4:27

     youtube.com

     Not all scientific studies are created equal - David H. Schwartz

     Apr 28, 2014

     574.2K Views

   View all

4. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articlesUntangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles

   Feb 4, 2022 · Untrustworthy science can and should be discounted and challenged, but uncertainty in science is unavoidable, and scientific characterization of uncertainty can be extremely useful when decision-makers have strategies for making decisions amidst that uncertainty.

5. www.scientificamerican.com › article › why-doubt-isWhy Doubt Is Essential to Science | Scientific American

   www.scientificamerican.com › article › why-doubt-is

   • Cached

   Oct 9, 2020 · But science cannot provide certainties. For example, a majority of Americans trust science as long as it does not challenge their existing beliefs.

6. www.scientificamerican.com › article › if-you-sayIf You Say 'Science Is Right,' You're Wrong - Scientific American

   www.scientificamerican.com › article › if-you-say

   • Cached

   Jul 1, 2021 · But in their zeal to fight back against vaccine rejection and other forms of science denial, some scientists say things that just aren't true—and you can't build trust if the things you...

7. link.springer.com › article › 10Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science - Springer

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Feb 4, 2022 · Untrustworthy science can and should be discounted and challenged, but uncertainty in science is unavoidable, and scientific characterization of uncertainty can be extremely useful when decision-makers have strategies for making decisions amidst that uncertainty.

8. People also ask

   Can untrustworthy science be challenged?

   • Untrustworthy science can and should be discounted and challenged, but uncertainty in science is unavoidable, and scientific characterization of uncertainty can be extremely useful when decision-makers have strategies for making decisions amidst that uncertainty.

   Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science - PMC

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815018/

   See all results for this question

   Should science require scientific expertise to assess trustworthiness?

   • The following article is authored by Heather Douglas. The trustworthiness of science should not require scientific expertise to assess. Trustworthiness should be based on the presence of expertise, good expert community functioning, and shared values.

   What makes science trustworthy? A guide for the public

   en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/analytics/what-makes-science-trustworthy-guide-public

   See all results for this question

   Which domain of scientific uncertainty is most distinct from trustworthiness?

   • The domain of scientific uncertainty that tends to be most distinct from trustworthiness concerns quantitative analyses of uncertainty. Both scientists and external critics of science commonly identify qualitative aspects of scientific uncertainty.

   Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science - PMC

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8815018/

   See all results for this question

   Is public (dis)trust a problem in science education?

   • Both issues are important and relevant to the problem of public (dis)trust in science, yet these concerns are frequently conflated in the science education literature and science education instruction.

   Untangling Trustworthiness and Uncertainty in Science

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-022-00322-6

   See all results for this question

   What grounds the trustworthiness of scientific expertise for the public?

   • When debate is ongoing, members of the public can place trust in such an expert. The expert would make judgments about the science the way a member of the public would if they had the necessary expertise. This view of what grounds the trustworthiness of scientific expertise for the public encompasses cases of consensus.

   What makes science trustworthy? A guide for the public

   en.unesco.org/inclusivepolicylab/analytics/what-makes-science-trustworthy-guide-public

   See all results for this question

   Do certainties undermine the scientific process?

   • Doubt might be troubling, but it impels us towards a better understanding; certainties, as reassuring as they may seem, in fact undermine the scientific process. Scientists understand this, but in the dynamic between the public and science, there are two significant pitfalls.

   Why Doubt Is Essential to Science | Scientific American

   www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-doubt-is-essential-to-science/

   See all results for this question

9. link.springer.com › article › 10Trustworthiness of Science in Debate: Challenges, Responses ...

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Nov 28, 2021 · We examine the kinds of bias that can affect science, the mechanisms available for dealing with them, and the arguments against treating them as a basis for blanket scepticism.