Search results
Apr 14, 2021 · A recent Court of Appeal decision gives clarity to the frequently litigated issue which arises when the Ontario Review Board finds the continued detention of a not-criminally-responsible accused is no longer necessary, but the detaining hospital decides to keep them.
- Aidan Macnab
Dec 9, 2022 · The common law confessions rule provides that a confession to a person in authority is presumptively inadmissible, unless the Crown proves beyond a reasonable doubt that it was voluntary. Under this rule, an involuntary confession always warrants exclusion.
VOLUME 59 2021–2022 NUMBER 1 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW BOARD OF EDITORS Editor in Chief Managing Editor CHARISMA RICKSY NGUEPDO SHANNON WRIGHT ... 1/13/2021 1:46:46 PM ...
- Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder
- Unfit to Stand Trial
- Present Study
It is a fundamental principle of the Canadian criminal justice system that an accused must posses the capacity to understand that his or her behaviour was wrong in order to be found guilty of an offence. According to section 16 of the Criminal Code: No person is criminally responsible for an act committed or an omission made while suffering from a ...
While an accused deemed NCRMD has been found to have committed the act that formed the basis of the offence for which he or she has been charged, it is also possible that an accused is not able to participate in his or her full answer and defence on account of mental disorder. In such cases, it is considered inconsistent with the principles of fund...
The goal of this present study is to provide basic information on Review Board systems in Canada and the people who have passed through their control. Currently, there is little information on the nature of NCRMD and UST cases that are processed through Review Board systems, including the type of offences for which accused have been charged, the ps...
Mar 31, 2021 · Strong jurisprudence from the Federal Courts suggest that the standard of review for procedural fairness remains uncertain. The Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan has indicated its preference for the side of “correctness.”. Nevertheless, the issue remains far from resolved in Saskatchewan.
Extension on consent — high-risk accused. (1.31) Despite subsections (1) to (1.2) [mandatory 12 month review of dispositions and extensions], the Review Board may extend the time for holding a hearing in respect of a high-risk accused to a maximum of 36 months after making or reviewing a disposition if the accused is represented by counsel ...
CanLII's goal is to make Canadian law accessible for free on the Internet. This website provides access to court judgments, tribunal decisions, statutes and regulations from all Canadian jurisdictions.
