Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.researchgate.net › publication › 312308493(PDF) Psychology of Language - ResearchGate

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 312308493

   Jan 12, 2017 · Psycholinguistics is about how we produce and recognize the speech and functioning of the brain to process the language. The cognitive processes of a language can shortly be called as memory ...

   • Author: Hakan Aydogan

2. www.apa.org › pubs › booksEssentials of Discursive Psychology

   www.apa.org › pubs › books

   1. Conceptual Foundations of Discursive Psychology. What Is Discourse, and What Is Discourse Analysis? What Is Discursive Psychology, and What Is Critical Discursive Psychology? Why Choose Discursive Psychology, and What Does This Choice Entail? What Are Some Major Components of Discursive Psychology? Deciding Whether to Use This Methodology. 2.

   • File Size: 183KB

   • Page Count: 12

3. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articlesMixed-methods research: A tutorial for speech-language ...

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › pmc › articles

   Jul 12, 2018 · Mixed-methods research is a relatively new approach in the fields of speech-language therapy and audiology and has been under-represented in these disciplines as compared, to mono-method approaches.

   • Author: Anna Maria Wium, Brenda Louw
   • DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v65i1.573

   • Publish Year: 2018
   • Publication: S Afr J Commun Disord. 2018; 65(1): 573.

4. www.researchgate.net › publication › 304041208(PDF) Speech Errors: Psycholinguistic Approach - ResearchGate

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 304041208

   Dec 31, 2006 · Using generalized linear mixed model regression analysis, we found that decisions related to a semantically modified idiom were made faster than decisions related to a phonematically modified...

5. www.sciencedirect.com › science › articleWhat's an error anyway? Speaker- and listener-centered ...

   www.sciencedirect.com › science › article

   Jan 1, 2023 · In this chapter, I argue that sociolinguistic variation is important to consider for listener errors: we can make correct speaker-specific inferences about why utterances occurred, but our inferences can also lead us astray. I discuss examples like these in the ‘Listener-centered approaches’ section below.

6. www.academia.edu › 35856675 › A_Dictionary_ofA Dictionary of Psychology FOURTH EDITION - Academia.edu

   www.academia.edu › 35856675 › A_Dictionary_of

   • Cached

   This dictionary provides systematic coverage of these areas, in addition to the basic terminology of psychology and psychiatry, and the definitions contain more explicit factual information and explanation than is available in other dictionaries.

7. People also ask

   What is mixed research in Speech-Language Therapy & Audiology?

   • In short, mixed research acknowledges a meta-paradigmatic existence. Research in speech-language therapy and audiology aims to not only accumulate knowledge concerning communication and its disorders but also consider the therapeutic issues that could improve the quality of life of individuals with communication disorders.

   Mixed-methods research: A tutorial for speech-language therapists and

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111631/

   See all results for this question

   What is mixed-methods research?

   • Mixed-methods research makes an important contribution to the understanding of individuals with communication disorders, and in turn, researchers in the two disciplinary fields of speech-language therapy and audiology can contribute to the development of this research approach.

   Mixed-methods research: A tutorial for speech-language therapists and

   www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6111631/

   See all results for this question

   What is the mixed error effect?

   • The mixed error effect is the finding that errors are often both phonologically and semantically related to the target; this includes blend errors (like ‘mainly/mostly’ → ‘ monly ’; Fromkin, 1971) and word substitutions or exchanges (‘start’ → ‘stop’; Dell, 1986). Two insights come from this observation.

   What's an error anyway? Speaker- and listener-centered approaches to

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079742123000014

   See all results for this question

   Do speech errors sound like utterances produced as targets?

   • First, phonetic research shows that speech errors do not sound exactly like utterances produced as targets. This makes it occasionally possible to tell what is an error by the phonetics of the utterance alone (as shown in Fig. 1 G). A /p/ produced in lieu of a /b/ will sound a bit more like a /b/, with a reduced voice onset time.

   What's an error anyway? Speaker- and listener-centered approaches to

   www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079742123000014

   See all results for this question

   Are mixed substitution errors semantic or phonological?

   • In mixed substitution errors the intrusion is both semantically and phonologically related to the target (e.g. 13 and 14). W e find mixed errors far more often McGill, 1978). W e also find similar results in artificially induced speech errors (e.g. (Martin, W eisberg, & Saffran, 1989).

   (PDF) Speech Errors: Psycholinguistic Approach - ResearchGate

   www.researchgate.net/publication/304041208_Speech_Errors_Psycholinguistic_Approach

   See all results for this question

   What is a speech error?

   • A speech error is a mismatch between what we intend to say and what we actually say. This entry focuses upon a mismatch involving the sounds of the language, or slips of the tongue, and will not cover hesitations. Speech errors made language, and about the relation between language and the brain. This entry will focus on

   (PDF) Speech Errors: Psycholinguistic Approach - ResearchGate

   www.researchgate.net/publication/304041208_Speech_Errors_Psycholinguistic_Approach

   See all results for this question

8. psy.dmu.ac.uk › drhiles › pdf'sMixed Methods and the Problem of the Logic of Inquiry

   psy.dmu.ac.uk › drhiles › pdf's

   At least three fundamentally different logics of inquiry can be distinguished: (i) theory-driven, (ii) data-driven, and (iii) explanation-driven, each with its own inherent pattern of logical reasoning, i.e. deductive, inductive and abductive inference, respectively. It is here that “mixed methods” faces its foremost challenge.