Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. May 5, 2022 · If certain individuals face systematic exclusion from participation in science or from reaping the benefits of science, that is a threat that minimizes the epistemological value of the science itself, as well as the reach of its potential benefits.

  2. This term (and closely related ones, such as the politics of science) carries a wide range of meanings—and not only because scholars disagree over how to define “politics” and “science.” Unless one intends to signal any way in which politics and science intersect, greater specificity is needed.

  3. Protecting scientific integrity in government is vital to the Nation. Scientific integrity is defined as: “The adherence to professional practices, ethical behavior, and the principles of honesty and objectivity when conducting, managing, using the results of, and communicating about science and scientific activities.

  4. There is one meaning in OED's entry for the adjective unflattering. See ‘Meaning & use’ for definition, usage, and quotation evidence.

  5. When public controversies with a science component (science-related controversies) result from uncertainty—such as that which arises from either an inconclusive set of scientific findings or disagreements within the scientific community about how to interpret the results of science or how the results should be communicated—clear and ...

    • define unflattering in science research definition ap government science1
    • define unflattering in science research definition ap government science2
    • define unflattering in science research definition ap government science3
    • define unflattering in science research definition ap government science4
  6. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Defamation (Libel, Slander and "Breathing Space"), Prior Restraint, New York Times Co. v. United States and more.

  7. Mar 8, 2017 · Research is needed to determine how science communication can influence these processes and how they are affected by science-related controversy. Both individuals and organizations play a role in aggregating, diffusing, and interpreting scientific information for use by policy makers.