Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. appeasement. and American isolationism. in 20th-century international relations in The origins of World War II, 1929–39. Written by. Walter A. McDougall. Alloy-Ansin Professor of International Relations, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Author of The Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age and others.

    • Appeasement

      appeasement, Foreign policy of pacifying an aggrieved...

  2. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › AppeasementAppeasement - Wikipedia

    Appeasement, in an international context, is a diplomatic negotiation policy of making political, material, or territorial concessions to an aggressive power with intention to avoid conflict. [1] The term is most often applied to the foreign policy between 1935 and 1939 of the British governments of Prime Ministers Ramsay MacDonald, [a] Stanley ...

  3. appeasement, Foreign policy of pacifying an aggrieved country through negotiation in order to prevent war. The prime example is Britain’s policy toward Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany in the 1930s. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain sought to accommodate Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia in 1935 and took no action when Germany absorbed ...

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
    • British Domestic Concerns
    • British Imperial Politics
    • Other Geopolitical Considerations
    • Germany Annexes Austria
    • The Sudetenland View This Term in The Glossary Crisis
    • Chamberlain Negotiates with Hitler
    • Neville Chamberlain: “Peace For Our Time”
    • Winston Churchill Condemns The Munich Agreement

    The British policy of appeasement was partly a reflection of domestic issues, including economic problems and antiwar sentiment. In the 1930s, the Great Depression, known in Britain as the Great Slump, caused unemployment to skyrocket.Economic distress led to rallies and demonstrations in the streets. Antiwar sentiment and support for the policy of...

    Britain’s imperial politics also shaped the British government’s attitudes towards war and appeasement. British wealth, power, and identity depended on the empire, which included dominions and colonies. During World War I, the British had relied on their empire for resources and troops. In the event of another world war, the British needed the empi...

    The British policy of appeasement was also a reaction to the diplomatic landscape of the 1930s. The strongest international players at the time (namely the United States, Italy, the Soviet Union, and France) each had their own domestic and geopolitical considerations.1And, the League of Nations, which had been created to prevent war, proved to be i...

    In March 1938, Nazi Germany annexed Austria,a blatant violation of post World War I peace treaties. The annexation of Austria signaled the Nazis’ complete disregard for their neighbor’s sovereignty and borders. Despite this, the international community accepted it as a done deal. No foreign government intervened. The international community hoped t...

    All hopes that Germany would stop with Austria were dashed almost immediately. Hitler set his sights on the Sudetenland, a largely German-speaking region of Czechoslovakia. In summer 1938, the Nazis manufactured a crisis in the Sudetenland. They falsely claimed that Germans in the region were being oppressed by the Czechoslovak government. In reali...

    In September 1938, Europe seemed to be on the brink of war. It was at this point that Chamberlain personally got involved. On September 15, 1938, Chamberlain flew to Hitler’s vacation home in Berchtesgaden to negotiate the German leader’s terms. Chamberlain’s goal was to reach a diplomatic solution in order to avoid war. But the matter remained unr...

    Chamberlain returned from the meeting in Munich triumphant. In London, he famously proclaimed: Chamberlain is sometimes mistakenly quoted as having said “peace in our time.”

    Chamberlain’s optimism did not go unchallenged. In a speech to the House of Commons on October 5, 1938,Winston Churchill condemned the Munich Agreement. He referred to it as a “total and unmitigated defeat” for Britain and the rest of Europe. Moreover, Churchill claimed that the British policy of appeasement had “deeply compromised, and perhaps fat...

  4. Aug 10, 2018 · Appeasement is a policy of granting political and material concessions to an aggressive, foreign power. It often occurs in the hope of saturating the aggressor’s desires for further demands and, consequently, avoiding the outbreak of war. Veteran. Hero.

    • History Hit
  5. which concluded that arms sales to the Allies had involved America in the First World War, the Neutrality Act was intended to prevent a similar situation arising in any future European struggle. 5 Although the act enjoyed widespread public support, Roosevelt did not himself believe that the United States could remain unaffected

  6. People also ask

  7. Sep 30, 2018 · Reconsidering Appeasement. After 1938’s Munich Agreement, “appeasement” became a dirty word in international relations. But scholars argue that appeasement can be a useful tool. The icon indicates free access to the linked research on JSTOR. On September 30th, 1938, the Munich Agreement was reached. It has since become synonymous with ...

  1. People also search for