Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

    • Did not relinquish His divine power

      • Fully human and fully God, Jesus shared in our frailty (Isaiah 52:14; 53; Hebrews 2:17), but did not relinquish His divine power, for humility is not abandonment.
      www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/topical-studies/where-do-we-see-jesus-power-and-authority-on-full-display.html
  1. Dec 18, 2017 · My question is, how do you now understand Philippians 2:6–8 and Luke 2:52? Do these texts really necessitate that some attributes of the eternal divine nature of Jesus must have been given up at his incarnation?”

  2. Jan 4, 2022 · Jesus did not empty Himself of His divine attributes—no such attributes are mentioned in the verse, and it is obvious in the gospels that Jesus possessed the power and wisdom of God. Calming the storm is just one display of Jesus’ divine power (Mark 4:39).

  3. Sep 8, 2014 · The verse seems to indicate that Christ, who is the eternal Word (John 1:1-3), relinquished some aspects in the use of His divine power. The question arises, if Christ gave up any of His divine attributes can His act on the cross be a saving act since only One who is the God-Man can save sinful man?

  4. May 30, 2024 · Fully human and fully God, Jesus shared in our frailty (Isaiah 52:14; 53; Hebrews 2:17), but did not relinquish His divine power, for humility is not abandonment. Dr. Stephen Nichols observes, “He did not empty Himself of His divine nature. Jesus is truly God. He could not stop being God.”

    • Introduction
    • Jesus Did Not Become Less Divine
    • The Emptying Is Connected to Jesus’ Incarnation
    • Bible Commentary Observations
    • Jesus’ Emptying: Becoming A True Human and Servant
    • Conclusion

    The above Bible passage is a fine example of the deity of Jesus Christ. Being in “the form of God” means that Jesus is God himself, as we know from the context that being in “human form” made him truly human (verse 8). In addition, the fact that Jesus “did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped” while on the earth (or as the NIV puts it,...

    Let’s start with what the verse is not saying. The verse isn’t saying that when Jesus took the form of a servant and human that he emptied himself of his divine powers, attributes, authority, or equality with the Father. That is a heresy. Jesus did not become less God in the incarnation. The text simply says that he “emptied himself, taking the for...

    But here’s what we do know from the text: the action of Jesus “emptying” himself is connected to the incarnation, i.e., him taking on flesh. We also know from verse 8 that it was a humbling event. Indeed, being in the form of God, sitting at God’s right hand as his equal in heaven, Jesus had all the honour, glory, and privileges of God himself. How...

    The Moody Bible Commentary makes the following observation on this passage: Indeed, the verse does not say that Jesus temporarily gave up the independent use of his divine attributes, or that he even gave up anything, but that his emptying himself was none other than the act of him taking on the role of a servant, through the incarnation. In additi...

    From this evidence, we see that the act of Jesus having emptied himself, or as the ESV puts it, having “made himself nothing”, did not involve Jesus losing any divine power, attribute, or authority that he has as God the Son, but rather that it involved the humiliation of temporarily setting aside his divine privileges / honour / glory by stepping ...

    Jesus, who is God in flesh, displayed the ultimate example of humility by taking on the role of a human servant so that by his innocent suffering and death on the cross as our substitute and resurrection from the dead, our eternal sin debt was paid, and all those who believe in him will be saved and raised with him to life eternal (Acts 16:30–31). ...

  5. May 7, 2019 · There is a growing belief in the Church that Jesus completely emptied Himself of His divinity and/or attributes in order to become human so that He could be the perfect sacrifice for all humanity and that He attributed all of His works and doctrines to the Father.

  6. People also ask

  7. To begin with, in a powerful exposition of the crux interpretum, Philippians 2:5-11, John M. G. Barclay argues that God’s power is “qualitatively different from human power” (17) and, therefore, Christ did not relinquish his divine power; rather, he expressed this power in the weakness of his humanity for the purpose of reconciling ...

  1. People also search for