Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 5, 2021 · It is contended that under the rubric of constitutional dismemberment are two exceptional constitutional phenomena: the ought-to-be declared nullity of unconstitutional constitutional amendments and the legal unity-defying, extraconstitutional expression of what Hannah Arendt called “natality” in political action.

    • Ming-Sung Kuo
    • 2020
  2. Feb 1, 2016 · The dismemberment of a corpse is an event which usually causes sensation and curiosity. In fact, it is frequently considered as a more brutal and inhuman act than the homicide itself. The term “dismemberment” refers to a voluntary criminal act, thus excluding accidental events.

    • Davide Porta, Alberto Amadasi, Annalisa Cappella, Debora Mazzarelli, Francesca Magli, Daniele Gibell...
    • 2016
  3. Dec 30, 2010 · Definitions play a fundamental role in legal discourse, which can be identified in its two basic functions: avoiding ambiguity in interpretation, and warranting the application of a law to a case.

  4. Nov 1, 2020 · It is easy for one to jump to the conclusion that one has to be psychiatrically ill to commit an act of extreme violence: mass murder, homicide, mutilation, and even post-mortem dismemberment, but how does this inference play out in a Western court of law?

    • Molly Tidrick, Gary Brucato, Victor Petreca, Ann W. Burgess, Michael H. Stone
    • 2020
  5. review.law.stanford.edu › wp-content › uploadsStanford Law Review

    it is not difficult to give a meaning to [the Equal Protection] clause. The existence of laws in the States where the newly emancipated negroes resided, which discriminated with gross injustice and hardship against them as a class, was the evil to be remedied by this clause, and by it such laws are forbidden.” (emphasis added)). 11.

  6. Jan 20, 2021 · To see how these recommendations might work in practice, consider two leading statutory interpretation cases that highlight the importance of the audience question and that demonstrate how default rules could help constrain the judicial search for ordinary meaning. In Taniguchi v.

  7. People also ask

  8. Mar 11, 2024 · What the words and phrases in a statute “mean” in a legal sense differs from what they “mean” in a linguistic sense. Ordinary meaning and plain meaning are both claims about linguistic meaning—specifically, what the statutory words and phrases in context would convey to a reasonable English user.

  1. People also search for