Search results
- Anti-discrimination policies that rely on a punitive approach are not sufficient to combat discrimination. They must be complemented by policies that counter prejudice and stereotypes and that limit the expression of cognitive biases and attention-based discrimination.
wol.iza.org/articles/do-anti-discrimination-policies-work/long
People also ask
Does anti-discrimination legislation actually deter discrimination?
Why are anti-discrimination laws important?
Does corrective justice address systemic discrimination?
Does the Racial Equality Directive affect ethnic discrimination in hiring?
What is the legal anti-discrimination framework?
Should employers be focusing on proving discrimination after the fact?
Anti-discrimination policies that rely on a punitive approach are not sufficient to combat discrimination. They must be complemented by policies that counter prejudice and stereotypes and that limit the expression of cognitive biases and attention-based discrimination.
- Marie-Anne Valfort
- 2018
A new IZA World of Labor report shows that anti-discrimination policies that rely on a punitive approach are not sufficient to combat discrimination. New research is shedding light on the impact of interventions that aim to reduce prejudices. Discrimination is a complex, multi-factor phenomenon.
Jun 2, 2018 · A new IZA World of Labor report shows that anti-discrimination policies that rely on a punitive approach are not sufficient to combat discrimination. New research is shedding light on the impact of interventions that aim to reduce prejudices.
Policies based purely on a ‘punitive’ approach are insufficient without complementary ‘proactive’ policies to promote equal opportunities and diversity.
Oct 8, 2024 · This paper connects the prevalent critique of corrective justice in addressing systemic discrimination with the fundamental tenets of substantive equality: the commitment to achieve equitable outcomes and acknowledge the historical patterns of disadvantage faced by Indigenous peoples in Canada.
Jan 19, 2021 · Policymakers should advance legislation and policies to eliminate onerous legal standards and evidentiary hurdles for workers who file lawsuits and revitalize legal doctrines to align with the language and broad purpose of Title VII and other anti-discrimination laws. The Supreme Court’s recent Bostock v.
Anti-discrimination policies that rely on a punitive approach are not sufficient to combat discrimination. They must be complemented by policies that counter prejudice and stereotypes and that limit the expression of cognitive biases and attention-based discrimination.
