Search results
- By reviewing others’ work and preparing constructive written or verbal feedback for their peers, students also start thinking more about their own work and how to improve it. Throughout the process, they connect with each other and form relationships through collaborative writing and review cycles.
www.hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/when-students-critique-each-others-work-learning-happens
People also ask
Do peer review activities lead to meaningful learning?
Do peer review-related activities affect learning outcomes?
Why is peer review important?
Does peer review improve student learning?
Why is it difficult to measure the details of the peer review process?
Are students concerned about peer review?
- Analytic Strategy
- Does Accuracy Change Through Discussion?
- Does Confidence Predict Switching?
- Does Correctness Predict Switching Beyond Confidence?
Data are available on the OpenScienceFramework: https://mfr.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/5qc46/?action=download%26mode=render. For most of our analyses we used linear mixed-effects models (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Murayama, Sakaki, Yan, & Smith, 2014). The unit of analysis in a mixed-effect model is the outcome of a single trial (e.g., ...
First, we examined how correctness changed across peer discussion. A logit model predicting correctness from time point (pre-discussion to post-discussion) revealed that the odds of correctness increased by 1.57 times (95% confidence interval (conf) 1.31–1.87) from pre-discussion to post-discussion, as shown in Table 2. In fact, 88% of students sho...
Differences in the amount of switching to correct or incorrect answers could be driven solely by differences in confidence, as described in our first theory mentioned earlier. For this theory to hold, answers with greater confidence must have a greater likelihood of being correct. To examine whether initial confidence is associated with initial cor...
Discussion may reveal information about the correctness of answers by generating new knowledge and testing the coherence of each possible answer. To test whether the correctness of an answer added predictive power beyond the confidence of the peers involved in discussion, we analyzed situations in which students disagreed with their partner. Out of...
- Jonathan G. Tullis, Robert L. Goldstone
- 2020
Mar 20, 2023 · To better understand learning from peer feedback, Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC) Senior Scientist Christian Schunn and co-author Yong Wu examined a range of typically occurring peer review-related activities: giving feedback, receiving feedback, and acting on peer feedback.
Apr 1, 2023 · We examine a range of typically-occurring peer review-related activities (providing, receiving, and revision) in terms of their relative impacts on learning, teasing apart the relative benefits to particular kinds of comments (i.e., suggestions and explanations) received and provided on learning outcomes.
Dec 12, 2019 · Decades of research indicate that peer interaction, where individuals discuss or work on a task collaboratively, may be beneficial for children’s and adolescents’ learning. Yet, we do not know which features of interaction may be related to learning from peer interaction.
Peer review is also beneficial for developing students’ audience awareness, fostering social skills such as learning how to provide and accept critical comments, justifying one’s own position, and declining nonproduc-tive suggestions (Topping, 2009).
Feb 29, 2024 · Good peer review is about so much more than a recommendation of whether or not a paper should be published in a given journal. Good peer review points out strengths and weaknesses and contributes to advancing a field by making the literature more robust and reliable.
