Search results
- By reviewing others’ work and preparing constructive written or verbal feedback for their peers, students also start thinking more about their own work and how to improve it. Throughout the process, they connect with each other and form relationships through collaborative writing and review cycles.
www.hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/when-students-critique-each-others-work-learning-happens
People also ask
Do peer review activities lead to meaningful learning?
Why is peer review important?
Why is it difficult to measure the details of the peer review process?
Does peer review improve student learning?
Are students concerned about peer review?
Does peer review influence Writing performance?
- Analytic Strategy
- Does Accuracy Change Through Discussion?
- Does Confidence Predict Switching?
- Does Correctness Predict Switching Beyond Confidence?
Data are available on the OpenScienceFramework: https://mfr.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/5qc46/?action=download%26mode=render. For most of our analyses we used linear mixed-effects models (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Murayama, Sakaki, Yan, & Smith, 2014). The unit of analysis in a mixed-effect model is the outcome of a single trial (e.g., ...
First, we examined how correctness changed across peer discussion. A logit model predicting correctness from time point (pre-discussion to post-discussion) revealed that the odds of correctness increased by 1.57 times (95% confidence interval (conf) 1.31–1.87) from pre-discussion to post-discussion, as shown in Table 2. In fact, 88% of students sho...
Differences in the amount of switching to correct or incorrect answers could be driven solely by differences in confidence, as described in our first theory mentioned earlier. For this theory to hold, answers with greater confidence must have a greater likelihood of being correct. To examine whether initial confidence is associated with initial cor...
Discussion may reveal information about the correctness of answers by generating new knowledge and testing the coherence of each possible answer. To test whether the correctness of an answer added predictive power beyond the confidence of the peers involved in discussion, we analyzed situations in which students disagreed with their partner. Out of...
- Jonathan G. Tullis, Robert L. Goldstone
- 2020
Peer review is also beneficial for developing students’ audience awareness, fostering social skills such as learning how to provide and accept critical comments, justifying one’s own position, and declining nonproduc-tive suggestions (Topping, 2009).
Dec 12, 2019 · learning activities are often not systematically managed or planned in the classroom (Baines, Blatchford, & Chowne, 2007). More-over, peer interaction is not always effective (e.g., Chan, 2001; Stacey, 1992). In this article, we present a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of peer interaction across a variety of areas of learn-
Jan 13, 2022 · In this study, we suggest reflection on peer reviewing as one approach to providing a platform for students to engage in reflective practices and for stimulating active learning in higher education, and to make that learning visible to the educator.
However, research into the learning processes in peer assessment is scarce both in theory and in practice, making it difficult to evaluate and pinpoint its value as a tool in assessment as learning (AaL). This study focuses both on the learning process and outcome through assessment activities.
Evidence from peers may include peer review of teaching and teaching materials, invitations from peers to present on teaching and learning, teaching awards received from peers, and other formal and informal feedback. Peer Review. What is it? Why do it? Peer review models, processes and examples.
