Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. • • By reviewing others’ work and preparing constructive written or verbal feedback for their peers, students also start thinking more about their own work and how to improve it. Throughout the process, they connect with each other and form relationships through collaborative writing and review cycles.
     www.hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/when-students-critique-each-others-work-learning-happens

     When Students Critique Each Other’s Work, Learning Happens

2. People also ask

   Do peer review activities lead to meaningful learning?

   • While there is occasionally doubt—for me and for students—that peer review activities will result in meaningful learning, I am always pleasantly surprised by how involved my students become with the process over the course of the term and how much insight they possess about good writing once they have a clear framework.

   When Students Critique Each Other’s Work, Learning Happens

   www.hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/when-students-critique-each-others-work-learning-happens

   See all results for this question

   Why is peer review important?

   • Peer review is also beneficial for developing students’ audience awareness, fostering social skills such as learning how to provide and accept critical comments, justifying one’s own position, and declining nonproduc-tive suggestions (Topping, 2009).

   The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on Writing

   files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1294485.pdf

   See all results for this question

   How does peer review improve learning?

   • Peer assessment, or review, can improve overall learning by helping students become better readers, writers, and collaborators. A well-designed peer review program also develops students’ evaluation and assessment skills. The following are a few techniques that instructors have used to implement peer review.

   Teaching students to evaluate each other - Cornell University

   teaching.cornell.edu/resource/teaching-students-evaluate-each-other

   See all results for this question

   Does peer review help students write?

   • Peer review has been identi-fied as an efficient means for helping students write, but prior research has predominantly focused on the effects of peer review on students’ writing per-formance of the same writing task (i.e., students revise their drafts on receiving peer feedback).

   The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on Writing

   files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1294485.pdf

   See all results for this question

   How do I encourage students to participate in peer review?

   • Encourage students to respond as a peer, not as a teacher. Present peer review as an opportunity for students to receive extensive feedback on their work. Explicitly link peer review with the course learning outcomes (what you want students to know, value, or do).

   Teaching students to evaluate each other - Cornell University

   teaching.cornell.edu/resource/teaching-students-evaluate-each-other

   See all results for this question

   Can peer review improve writing skills?

   • Earlier research suggests that one possible mechanism by which student peer review might improve writing skill is that students tend to provide more critical feedback on their peers’ papers than course teaching assistants (Kottke, 1988).

   Benefits of Peer Review on Students’ Writing

   journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1475725719835070

   See all results for this question

3. cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.comWhy does peer instruction benefit student learning?

   cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com

   • Cached

   • Analytic Strategy
   • Does Accuracy Change Through Discussion?
   • Does Confidence Predict Switching?
   • Does Correctness Predict Switching Beyond Confidence?

   Data are available on the OpenScienceFramework: https://mfr.osf.io/render?url=https://osf.io/5qc46/?action=download%26mode=render. For most of our analyses we used linear mixed-effects models (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Murayama, Sakaki, Yan, & Smith, 2014). The unit of analysis in a mixed-effect model is the outcome of a single trial (e.g., ...

   See full list on cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com

   First, we examined how correctness changed across peer discussion. A logit model predicting correctness from time point (pre-discussion to post-discussion) revealed that the odds of correctness increased by 1.57 times (95% confidence interval (conf) 1.31–1.87) from pre-discussion to post-discussion, as shown in Table 2. In fact, 88% of students sho...

   See full list on cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com

   Differences in the amount of switching to correct or incorrect answers could be driven solely by differences in confidence, as described in our first theory mentioned earlier. For this theory to hold, answers with greater confidence must have a greater likelihood of being correct. To examine whether initial confidence is associated with initial cor...

   See full list on cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com

   Discussion may reveal information about the correctness of answers by generating new knowledge and testing the coherence of each possible answer. To test whether the correctness of an answer added predictive power beyond the confidence of the peers involved in discussion, we analyzed situations in which students disagreed with their partner. Out of...

   See full list on cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com

   • Author: Jonathan G. Tullis, Robert L. Goldstone

   • Publish Year: 2020

4. Videos

   • 

     5:33

     youtube.com

     How to Give Constructive and Actionable Peer Feedback: Students to Students

     Mar 3, 2022

     18.7K Views

   • 

     4:51

     youtube.com

     How to Write Effective Peer Review Comments

     Aug 19, 2020

     96.9K Views

   • 

     5:04

     youtube.com

     Peer Review: Commenting Strategies

     Jun 7, 2013

     124.8K Views

   View all

5. files.eric.ed.gov › fulltext › EJ1294485The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on ...

   files.eric.ed.gov › fulltext › EJ1294485

   Peer review is also beneficial for developing students’ audience awareness, fostering social skills such as learning how to provide and accept critical comments, justifying one’s own position, and declining nonproduc-tive suggestions (Topping, 2009).

6. www.wiley.com › en-us › networkThe peer review process as a lever for learning - Wiley

   www.wiley.com › en-us › network

   • Cached

   Feb 29, 2024 · Good peer review is about so much more than a recommendation of whether or not a paper should be published in a given journal. Good peer review points out strengths and weaknesses and contributes to advancing a field by making the literature more robust and reliable.

7. teaching.cornell.edu › resource › teaching-studentsTeaching students to evaluate each other | Center for ...

   teaching.cornell.edu › resource › teaching-students

   • Cached

   Peer assessment, or review, can improve overall learning by helping students become better readers, writers, and collaborators. A well-designed peer review program also develops students’ evaluation and assessment skills.

8. www.lrdc.pitt.edu › Engagement-with-Peer-ReviewEngagement with Peer Review: A Revised Model of Learning from ...

   www.lrdc.pitt.edu › Engagement-with-Peer-Review

   • Cached

   Mar 20, 2023 · To better understand learning from peer feedback, Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC) Senior Scientist Christian Schunn and co-author Yong Wu examined a range of typically occurring peer review-related activities: giving feedback, receiving feedback, and acting on peer feedback.

9. journals.sagepub.com › doi › fullBenefits of Peer Review on Students’ Writing - Matthew M ...

   journals.sagepub.com › doi › full

   Apr 10, 2019 · Fallahi, Wood, Austad, and Fallahi (2006) found that the effect of peer review combined with didactic instruction on writing, formal feedback, and in-class practice was effective at improving writing skills for psychology students.