Search results
Aug 27, 2012 · communal behaviour will augment status in more prestige-based hierarchies, but diminish status in more dominance-based hierarchies. We tested our main hypotheses in two studies with complementary designs, one conducted in a naturalistic setting (Study 1) and the other in the laboratory (Study 2). 448 Wendy de Waal-Andrews et al.
167 The Dominance-Prestige Account 168 More recently, Henrich and Gil-White (2001) developed an alternative evolutionary 169 model that takes into account both our species’ heritage as primates who tend to use coercive 170 dominance, and as cultural beings who rely immensely on cultural learning. By considering the
Nov 19, 2012 · an eye tracker. Dominant and Prestigious targets each received greater visual attention than targets low on either dimension. Together, these findings demonstrate that Dominance and Prestige are distinct yet viable strategies for ascending the social hierarchy, consistent with evolutionary theory.
perceived status impact. Furthermore, this revised conclusion is consistent with other studies showing that both prestige (i.e., benefit-generation) and dominance (i.e., cost-infliction) are important contributors to status outcomes, and can have a similarly large impact (6–10).
Dec 27, 2019 · 1) Dominance and prestige strategies are independent from each other 1 2. 2) Both dominance and prestige strategies lead to acquiring high social rank. and social influence 1 2. 3) Dominance and ...
individuals with high dominance or prestige ratings also received more visual attention than those with low dominance or prestige ratings. Our aim here is to extend and verify the findings reviewed above concerning the viability of prestige and dominance as strategies for attaining status within groups. We repeated Cheng et al.’s [1] general
May 1, 2019 · Prestige and dominance are thought to be two evolutionarily distinct routes to gaining status and influence in human social hierarchies. Prestige is attained by having specialist knowledge or ...
