Search results
- Researchers have a duty to provide participants with information about the research they are being asked to participate in, potential risks and benefits, as well as the opportunity to ask questions and give their free and informed consent to participate in research, or to decline to do so.
neac.health.govt.nz/national-ethical-standards/part-two/7-informed-consent
For research with humans to be considered ethical, it is essential that participants provide their free, informed and ongoing consent. Research can begin only after the participants have provided their initial consent, and individuals must have the possibility to withdraw their consent at any point during the research project.
Consent encompasses a process that begins with the initial contact (e.g., recruitment) and carries through to the end of participants’ involvement in the project. Throughout the process, researchers have an ongoing duty to provide participants and REBs with all information relevant to participants’ ongoing consent to participate in the ...
In specific research, the researcher has a responsibility to ensure that the terms of participant consent are respected (Respect for Persons) and that participant welfare is protected (Concern for Welfare) throughout the life of the research project.
As part of the consent process, researchers should provide participants the necessary information for making an informed decision to participate in research ( Article 3.2 ), including an explanation of the responsibilities of participants, and assurances regarding their rights and freedom to withdraw at any time without prejudice to pre-existing...
We identified three main categories of arguments for the acceptability of a consent waiver: data validity and quality, major practical problems, and distress or confusion of participants. Approval by a medical ethical review board always needs to be obtained.
It is widely accepted that informed consent is a requirement of ethical biomedical research. It is less clear why this is so. As an argumentative strategy the article asks whether it would be legitimate for the state to require people to participate in research.
People also ask
Do researchers have a duty to provide participants with consent?
Do you need a consent to conduct a research?
Who is responsible for ensuring research consent is met?
Do repositories and researchers have a duty to provide informed consent?
What is a research consent policy?
Can a researcher conduct research if a participant refuses to participate?
All investigators carrying out research with human participants have legal and ethical responsibilities under the Common Rule (see Chapter 3) and the standards of institutional review boards (IRBs), such as obtaining informed consent, ensuring the risks of research are proportional to the expected benefits, and minimizing risks.
