Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Jan 10, 2022 · These models make predictions about how dominance relationships might change under different perturbations, such as the removal of the dominant individual, changes in physical condition, social mobility among other group-members or stochastic outcomes of interactions that do not align with the dominance relationship.

    • Login

      These models make predictions about how dominance...

    • Download PDF

      stand causes and consequences of position in the dominance...

    • Why Hens

      Moreover, dominance refers to the capacity to make another...

  2. Mar 13, 2024 · The ultimate effect of a genotype on fitness is given by the combination of the genotype-phenotype map (a or b) and the phenotype-fitness map (c or d) in the matrix of resultant genotype-fitness panels (i–iv): (i) additivity, (ii) dominance reversal owing to the genotype-phenotype map or (iii) owing to the phenotype-fitness map, and (iv) a greater magnitude of dominance reversal owing to ...

    • 10.1098/rspb.2023.2816
    • 2024/03
    • Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Mar; 291(2018): 20232816.
  3. Jan 10, 2022 · Social eavesdropping also requires animals to adopt a non-egocentric perspective and assess interactions they do not directly participate in. Keeping track of a broad network of social interactions has potential to dramatically increase the cognitive challenges of social life compared with only keeping track of personal interactions . As a result, social information use influences cognitive ...

  4. Abstract. Social dominance theory was developed to account for why societies producing surplus take and maintain the form of group-based dominance hierarchies, in which at least one socially-constructed group has more power than another, and in which men are more powerful than women and adults more powerful than children.

    • Felicia Pratto, Andrew L. Stewart, Fouad Bou Zeineddine
    • 2013
  5. Oct 29, 2020 · The key idea of the book is this: When there is a clear and understood social hierarchy, conflict is less likely. Status ambiguity increases the likelihood of conflict. Status ambiguity increases ...

  6. Apr 20, 2022 · Recently, scholars have made considerable headway studying the social gains made by disadvantaged groups, including a better understanding of how relatively advantaged groups (e.g., White people; men) often pushback against and resist shifts in group-based power or prestige.

  7. People also ask

  8. Oct 31, 2019 · In a study of small ‘minimal’ laboratory groups, dominance and prestige co-emerged as distinct strategies for gaining social rank (informal leadership) [21 •]. Rank was assessed using peers’ judgments of relative influence, uninvolved outside observers’ judgments of influence, actual behavioral impact over collective decision-making, and eye-tracked differential gaze and attention.

  1. People also search for