Search results
The intention of Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men is highlighted in the title. Rose has made it clear that, whilst prejudice, expectations and personal issues all play a part in the conflicts and ...
Twelve Angry Men. Character List. The 8th Juror. An architect, father, and the single initial “not guilty” vote. The 8th Juror argues that the men should take their time in coming to a verdict. He slowly and painstakingly examines the evidence and testimony to decide if there are grounds for a conviction.
- The Characters of 'Twelve Angry Men'
- Juror #8
- Juror #9
- Juror #5
- Juror #11
- Juror #2
- Juror #6
- Juror #7
- Juror #12
- Foreman
Instead of organizing the jurors in numeric order, the characters are listed here in the order they decide to vote in favor of the defendant. This progressive look at the cast is important for the final outcome of the play, as one jurorafter another changes their mind about the verdict.
He votes “not guilty” during the jury’s first vote. Described as "thoughtful" and "gentle," Juror #8 is usually portrayed as the most heroic member of the jury. He is devoted to justice and is right away sympathetic toward the 19-year-old defendant. Juror #8 spends the rest of the play urging the others to practice patience and to contemplate the d...
Juror #9 is described in the stage notes as a “mild gentle old man...defeated by life and...waiting to die.” Despite this bleak description, he is the first to agree with Juror #8, deciding that there is not enough evidence to sentence the young man to death and becomes more and more sure of himself as the play proceeds. During Act One, Juror #9 is...
This young man is nervous about expressing his opinion, especially in front of the elder members of the group. In Act One, his allure makes others believe that he is the one who changed his mind during the secret vote. But, it wasn't him; he didn't dare go against the rest of the group yet. However, it is also his experience from the slums where he...
As a refugee from Europe, Juror #11 has witnessed great injustices. That is why he is intent on administering justice as a jury member. He sometimes feels self-conscious about his foreign accent, but overcomes his shyness and is willing to take on a more active part in the decision-making process. He conveys a deep appreciation for democracy and Am...
He is the timidest man of the group. For the 1957 adaptation, he was played by John Fielder (the voice of “Piglet” from Disney’s Winnie the Poohcartoons). Juror #2 is easily persuaded by the opinions of others and cannot explain the roots of his convictions. In the very beginning, he goes along with the general opinion, but soon Juror #8 wins his s...
Described as an “honest but dull-witted man,” Juror #6 is a house painter by trade. He is slow to see the good in others but eventually agrees with Juror #8. He defies the adversity and pursues the facts, in search of a more complete and objective picture. Juror #6 is the one who calls for another ballot and is also one of the first six pro-acquitt...
A slick, superior, and sometimes obnoxious salesman, Juror #7 admits during Act One that he would have done anything to miss jury duty and is trying to get out of it as fast as possible. He represents the many real-life individuals who loathe the idea of being on a jury. He is also quick to add his piece of mind to the conversation. He seems to wan...
He is an arrogant and impatient advertising executive. Juror #12 is anxious for the trial to be over so that he also can get back to his career and his social life. However, after Juror #5 tells the group about his knowledge of knife-fights, Juror #12 is the first one to waver in his conviction, eventually changing his mind to "not guilty."
Non-confrontational, Juror #1 serves as the foreman of the jury. He is serious about his authoritative role and wants to be as fair as possible. Despite being described as "not overly bright," he helps calm down the tensions and moves the conversation onward with professional urgency. He sides with the "guilty" side until, just like Juror #12, he c...
- Wade Bradford
Literary devices 12 angry men. Introduction: Rose uses the unity of both time, plot and setting to focus the audience’s attention on the deliberation process and the interaction between the jurors. Rose deliberately constructs a parallel personal story for the 3rd Juror, whose broken relationship with his 16-year-old son, influences his decision.
How does the fact that the jurors are all male impact the play? Rose definitely plays off of the masculine energy to create these archetypical characters. The title of the play is '12 Angry Men,' and it certainly does have an understanding of how particularly men settle problems in a confrontational, often personal, manner.
- Reginald Rose
May 18, 2023 · 12 Angry Men Summary. “Twelve Angry Men” unfolds in the confined setting of a jury deliberation room after the closing arguments in a murder trial have been presented. The defendant, a young man, is accused of stabbing his father to death. If found guilty, the mandatory sentence is the death penalty. The jurors, identified only by numbers ...
People also ask
Does Rose use masculine energy in 12 Angry Men?
Why are all jurors in Twelve Angry Men male?
Why does Rose use numbers in the 12th juror's case?
What happens in Twelve Angry Men?
Is 12 Angry Men a good play?
What does Rose say about the 8th juror?
The symbols of the locked door and the knife reflect Rose’s view that it is important to bring an open mind to the legal process. The jurors must investigate the facts without fear or favour and without the automatic presumption that a boy is guilty. Throughout the discussion among the jurors, Rose also points out that it is important to view ...
