Search results
United States of America and Japan Concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands, June 17, 1971, 23 U.S.T. 447 (the Okinawa Reversion Treaty); Okinawa Dugong III, 80 F. Supp. 3d at 995–96; Okinawa Dugong II, 543 F. Supp. 2d at 1084. Under the Okinawa Reversion Treaty, the United States ceased to administer Okinawa and the island chains,
Nov 25, 2014 · On April 16 of this year, DOD informed the court that it had done its work and determined that the base expansion would have "no adverse effect" on the dugongs. But the procedures it employed to reach this determination seem to bear only rhetorical resemblance either to Section 106 review as conducted in the U.S., or to the direction of the court.
Aug 15, 2008 · Abstract. In January 2008, a U.S. federal court in San Francisco ruled that the U.S. Defense Department's plans to construct a new U.S. offshore Marine airbase in Okinawa violated the National Historic Preservation Act by not protecting a Japanese “national monument,” the endangered Okinawa dugong. This article discusses the background and ...
- Miyume Tanji
- 2008
suggested a dugong-related lawsuit against the Henoko airbase construction, based on the U.S. government’s Endangered Species Act. After the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, however, environmentalist attorneys in the United States became wary of cases that might induce the U.S.
- 231KB
- 13
Jan 19, 2019 · United States. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (“ [t]he courts of appeals . . . shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts of the United States”). On August 1, 2018, the district court granted the DoD’s cross-motion for summary judgment and entered final judgment.
U.S. Court Rules in the “Okinawa Dugong” Case
Sep 1, 2008 · The result of this dialogue has been several plans to relocate some United States military units to a more remote part of Okinawa and other units to the United States territory of Guam (Fogarty ...
