Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. May 16, 2019 · It points to the periodizations emanating from the non-Marxist literature a-la-Bell: pre-industrial, industrial, and post-industrial society; and to periodizations in Marxist writings: competitive capitalism, monopoly capitalism, and late capitalism.

    • Richard Westra
    • 2019
  2. Nov 7, 2018 · The three most problematic concepts that he focuses on in his new book “Can American Capitalism Survive?” are: Capitalism automatically works when everyone pursues their own self-interest; the...

  3. The subsequent decades of the 1980s and 1990s saw profound transformations in both the growth and representation regimes – shifting the relationship between capitalism and democracy and ushering in a different set of distributive outcomes.

    • how did capitalism influence democracy in the 1980s & 1990s and 80s were better1
    • how did capitalism influence democracy in the 1980s & 1990s and 80s were better2
    • how did capitalism influence democracy in the 1980s & 1990s and 80s were better3
    • how did capitalism influence democracy in the 1980s & 1990s and 80s were better4
    • how did capitalism influence democracy in the 1980s & 1990s and 80s were better5
  4. His talk, titled “Instability and Inequality: American Capitalism after the Volcker Shock of 1980,” touched on the importance of the United States Federal Reserve in global economic policymaking, the links between inequality and the Great Recession, and the roots of contemporary economic transformations. Levy said that in his field ...

  5. Oct 1, 2002 · At the height of the 1990s economic boom—a period of unprecedented growth—capitalism American-style seemed triumphant. After sluggishness in the 1970s and 1980s, productivity in the United...

  6. Dec 31, 2023 · Since the beginning of the neoliberal era, it has been argued that there was a correlation between democracy and capitalism, and a strong democracy could ensure capitalist development and increase welfare.

  7. People also ask

  8. Jul 7, 2011 · The former produces stark inequalities in the distribution of property and income, while the latter divides power in a manner that is in principle egalitarian (one person, one vote). So why don’t the poor soak the rich? And if they do, how can capitalism be viable as an economic system?