Search results
Oct 28, 2019 · The fact the psychological contract is so easily changed means it is difficult to “enforce” and equally difficult on which to rely for guidance when it comes to the relationship between the employee and employer.
- Mason Stevenson
Breach of a legal contract allows the aggrieved party to seek enforcement in court. Breach of a psychological contract, however, offers no such recourse, and the aggrieved party may...
This Essay argues that the “psychological contract”—the parties’ respective, subjective, idiosyncratic understandings of their contractual obligations to one another—is important and predictable. The common law of contract tells us how to discern the legal promise.
We tailor this retrospective look by reviewing the antecedents and outcomes associated with psychological contract breach and discussing the dominant theoretical explanations for the breach-outcome relationship.
problems presently confronting the theoretical side of the psychological contract literature. In seeking to advance knowledge and understanding, this review calls for an alternative approach to studying the psychological contract a more on the basis of critical and discursive literature analysis. From this we unpick the construct of the
Jan 29, 2021 · Some of these policies and contracts are legal documents that need input from a lawyer. Others are more essential from an ethical and practical standpoint and juts require you to sit down and think about how you want to handle situations that come up in your business.
People also ask
How difficult is it to enforce a psychological contract?
Is there a need to psychological contract?
Is a psychological contract a pro or a con?
Are psychological contracts unchallenged?
Is a psychological contract real?
What if a psychological contract is breached?
A psychological contract (PC) is a reciprocal exchange of an unwritten promise formulated between and employee and an employer. Stemming from psychological foundations, PCs provide a powerful rationale for why employers must attend to the ‘human’ side of the employee-employer relationship.