Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Dec 18, 2018 · BACKGROUND. Stakeholder engagement in health research has become increasingly common as investigators, journal editors, and funders recognize its potential influence on the evidence we produce. 1, 2 With the expansion in recent years of patient-oriented and translational research, engagement of stakeholders—patients, clinicians, policy makers, and others, each including multiple members—is ...

  2. Mar 29, 2022 · For engagement to be successful, previous research has highlighted the importance of clarifying roles and expectations for stakeholder partners and ensuring that partners understand the value of their efforts to the project. 14 These findings offer additional insights to assess the progress and success of engagement, including whether engagement is yielding the desired influences and impacts ...

  3. May 18, 2015 · Abstract. This review introduces a conceptual framework for understanding stakeholder management (ShM) in the clinical and community-based research environment. In recent years, an evolution in practice has occurred in many applicants for public and non-governmental funding of public health research in hospital settings.

    • Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal, Sohel Akhter, Ferdinard Zizi, Girardin Jean-Louis, Chellamuthu Ramas...
    • 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00071
    • 2015
    • Front Psychiatry. 2015; 6: 71.
  4. Stakeholder analysis is a dynamic process and should be undertaken at the beginning of a project and revisited as the project evolves. Common stakeholders in healthcare improvement include, but are not limited to: patients, clinicians, managers, executives, clinical assistants and payers. The results of stakeholder analysis form the basis of ...

    • The Muse Consortium
    • Stakeholder Engagement in The Muse Project
    • Gin McMaster Guideline Development Checklist
    • Equity and The Progress-Plus Framework
    • Project Stages
    • Eligibility
    • Population
    • Intervention
    • Comparator
    • Study Designs

    The MuSE consortium was established in 2015 and includes over 80 researchers and stakeholders in various countries including: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Germany, Italy, Lebanon, the Netherlands, the Philippines, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. The team includes researchers, policymakers, guideline developers, research funders, clinicians, patient...

    We will develop a stakeholder engagement framework for this study that outlines how we will engage and evaluate our own stakeholder engagement processes throughout the project, drawing on principles of realist evaluation to explore what works, for whom, why, and in what context . We have adopted a co-production approach, drawing on the National Ins...

    This study will use the 18 steps contained in Schünemann et al.’s Guidelines 2.0 checklist, known as the GIN McMaster Guideline Development Checklist, for guideline development as its organizing framework . It provides guideline developers with a comprehensive checklist of items linked to relevant resources and tools to facilitate the guideline dev...

    The Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) expects that all research applicants will integrate gender and sex into their research designs when appropriate . The MuSE project recognizes gender as an important social determinant of health and contributor to health inequities. Gender refers to “the socially constructed characteristics of women...

    This study includes various stages (Fig. 1). Briefly, they are (1) the conduct of four concurrent systematic reviews, (2) the development of draft guidance, (3) an online international survey of external stakeholders and experts, (4) a consensus meeting of project stakeholders, and (5) the finalization of the guidance paper. This protocol focuses o...

    Included studies will discuss stakeholder engagement in guideline development that assesses existing guidance and methods for stakeholder engagement at each stage of the guideline development and implementation process, barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement, conflicts of interest of stakeholders in the guideline development and implem...

    For our purposes, stakeholders in guideline development are as described above under the “Key definitions” section.

    Eligible studies will involve/engage stakeholders in some role(s) during the guideline development process. Engagement and guidelines are as described above under the “Key definitions” section.

    Studies that do not involve stakeholders in the guideline development process will not be eligible for inclusion in this project.

    All reviews will include quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. As such, our methods will follow the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research, as appropriate [57, 58]. We will include randomized trials, non-randomized studies (e.g., cohort studies, before and aft...

    • Jennifer Petkovic, Alison Riddle, Elie A. Akl, Joanne Khabsa, Lyubov Lytvyn, Pearl Atwere, Pauline C...
    • 2020
  5. Jul 11, 2018 · Background Closing the gap between research production and research use is a key challenge for the health research system. Stakeholder engagement is being increasingly promoted across the board by health research funding organisations, and indeed by many researchers themselves, as an important pathway to achieving impact. This opinion piece draws on a study of stakeholder engagement in ...

  6. People also ask

  7. Dec 18, 2018 · Stakeholder engagement is increasingly common in health research, with protocols for engaging multiple stakeholder groups becoming normative in patient-centered outcomes research. Previous work has focused on identifying relevant stakeholder groups with whom to work and on working with stakeholders in evidence implementation. This paper draws on the expertise of a team from four countries ...

  1. People also search for