Search results
This article discusses dominance personality dimensions found in primates, particularly in the great apes, and how they compare to dominance in humans. Dominance traits are seen in virtually all primate species, and these dimensions reflect how adept an individual is at ascending within a social hierarchy.
Jun 29, 2023 · A pyramidal inference is drawn when dominance is generalized following a triadic-pyramidal pattern (one dominant individual and two subordinate individuals).
Oct 31, 2023 · The database composed of 40 behavioral patterns was created by us to provide a detailed description of social relationships in 19 non-human primate species to estimate a set of traits characteristic for egalitarianism vs. despotism (see Table 1).
Jan 1, 2021 · Some of the main measures used to quantify dominance hierarchies in primates are described here. Two widely used summary indices are linearity and steepness. Dominance hierarchies are often measured in terms of their linearity, i.e., the degree to which the rank order is transitive (de Vries 1995).
- keren.klass@mail.utoronto.ca
Aug 13, 2024 · These results suggest that the extent to which an individual consistently wins agonistic interactions, measured by hierarchy steepness, does not capture or reflect the variations in the extent to which dominance affects the acquisition of fitness-related benefits in primate groups.
Jan 10, 2022 · Dominance captures behavioural patterns found in social hierarchies that arise from agonistic interactions in which some individuals coercively exploit their control over costs and benefits to extract deference from others, often through aggression, threats and/or intimidation.
People also ask
How do we measure dominance in primate ethology?
What are dominance personality dimensions in primates?
What is a dominance hierarchy in nonhuman primates?
What are dominance traits?
How do you measure a dominance hierarchy?
What is dominance in sociology?
Sep 7, 2015 · The ‘prior attributes hypothesis’ posits that individual differences in fighting ability directly determine dominance ranks. By contrast, the ‘social dynamics hypothesis’ posits that dominance ranks emerge from social self-organization dynamics such as winner and loser effects.
