Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.berghahnjournals.com › view › journalsThe Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism - Berghahn Journals

   www.berghahnjournals.com › view › journals

   • Cached

   Jun 1, 2022 · Despotic majoritarianism refers to a form of democracy in which powerholders draw on majoritarian victories (such as in elections or referenda) to claim political legitimacy, while engaging in administrative despotism that constrains political expression and participation.

   • Author: Benjamin Abrams

2. www.cambridge.org › core › journalsWhy does Kant Think that Democracy is Necessarily Despotic?

   www.cambridge.org › core › journals

   • Cached

   When Kant claims that democracy ‘necessarily’ leads to despotism, we need to understand the point not as an empirical generalization, but as a way of pinpointing a structural defect of democracy. This point is worth further clarification.

3. link.springer.com › chapter › 10Compromise and Majority Rule: How Their Dynamic Affects Democracy

   link.springer.com › chapter › 10

   • Cached

   May 27, 2020 · Majority rule and compromise are both core elements of democratic politics: democracy would mean little without the majoritarian principle and compromise is required in pluralistic societies rife with fundamental moral and political disagreement.

   • Author: Patrick Overeem
   • Email: p.overeem@vu.nl

   • Publish Year: 2020

4. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Majoritarian_democracyMajoritarian democracy - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Majoritarian_democracy

   • Cached

   Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. [1] . Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible. [1][2][3][4] Characteristics. Lijphart offers what is perhaps the dominant definition of majoritarian democracy.

5. discovery.ucl.ac.uk › id › eprintThe Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism - UCL Discovery

   discovery.ucl.ac.uk › id › eprint

   • Cached

   This new strain of democratic disease threatens not just the United States but societies across Europe, Latin America, and South Asia. This article explores the nature of despotic majoritarianism, its manifestation today, and how we might combat it

   • DOI: 10.3167/dt.2022.090105
   • Type: Article

   • Title: The Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism

6. www.researchgate.net › publication › 321756741(PDF) Comparative Political Regimes: Consensus and ...

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 321756741

   Dec 12, 2017 · The study of democracy today has been influenced heavily by Arend Lijphart’s typology of consensus versus majoritarian democracy. Scholars have applied it to more than 100 countries and sought...

7. People also ask

   What is majoritarian democracy?

   • Majoritarian democracy is a form of democracy based upon a principle of majority rule. Majoritarian democracy contrasts with consensus democracy, rule by as many people as possible. Lijphart offers what is perhaps the dominant definition of majoritarian democracy.

   Majoritarian democracy - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majoritarian_democracy

   See all results for this question

   Is despotic majoritarianism a form of democracy?

   • The reason I call despotic majoritarianism a “form of democracy” rather than a political ideology, or style, is that—although certain regimes may express more or less majoritarian or more or less despotic behaviors—both steadily increase over time, in tandem, to effect the shift in the character of democracy to which we are now bearing witness.

   The Rise of Despotic Majoritarianism in: Democratic Theory Volume 9

   www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/democratic-theory/9/1/dt090105.xml

   See all results for this question

   Is a more majoritarian type of democracy feasible or advantageous?

   • more majoritarian type of democracy “is probably neither feasible nor advantageous.” for extreme-right and populist parties. Andeweg ( 2001) observes an empirical correlation of consensus democracy and electoral support for the extreme right. He argues that the the extremes, as only these parties provide a real alternative to the “establishment.”

   Comparative Political Regimes: Consensus and Majoritarian Democracy

   www.researchgate.net/publication/321756741_Comparative_Political_Regimes_Consensus_and_Majoritarian_Democracy

   See all results for this question

   Are majoritarianism signs of political despotism?

   • In an ever-growing democratic frenzy of majoritarianism, they are regarded as signs of administrative or even political despotism which can be legitimately overthrown—if, at least, democratic citizens have the revolutionary spirit to do that. Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005).

   Compromise and Majority Rule: How Their Dynamic Affects Democracy

   link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40802-2_3

   See all results for this question

   Does democracy 'necessarily' lead to despotism?

   • When Kant claims that democracy ‘necessarily’ leads to despotism, we need to understand the point not as an empirical generalization, but as a way of pinpointing a structural defect of democracy. This point is worth further clarification.

   Why does Kant Think that Democracy is Necessarily Despotic?

   www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review/article/why-does-kant-think-that-democracy-is-necessarily-despotic/2A2F58010D61E0F6F71C64994E1536AD

   See all results for this question

   What are the key features of a majoritarian democracy?

   • According to Lijphart, the key features of a majoritarian democracy are: Concentration of executive power. This means that the Cabinet or executive is composed entirely of members from a single party who holds the majority of seats in the legislature. Asymmetric bicameralism.

   Majoritarian democracy - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majoritarian_democracy

   See all results for this question

8. www.jstor.org › stable › jDemocracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus ... - JSTOR

   www.jstor.org › stable › j

   The majoritarian interpretation of the basic definition of democracy is that it means “government by the majority of the people.”. It argues that majorities should govern and that minorities should oppose. This view is challenged by the consensus model of democracy.