Search results
43 with those of participants from Study 1, and both Dominant and Prestigious targets received 44 greater visual attention than low-status targets. Together, these findings demonstrate that 45 Dominance and Prestige are distinct yet both viable status-obtaining strategies, consistent with 46 evolutionary theory. 47 48 49 50
Jan 10, 2022 · The evidence reviewed above indicates that dominance continues to be a viable route to rank acquisition, impacting both social influence and fitness in humans across a wide range of contexts, and plays a role in human status asymmetries from the youngest of ages.
This system of rank allocation is thought to serve a number of functions, such as increasing perceptions that the hierarchy is legitimate and fair—which minimizes conflict— and allowing the group to maximize contributions from its most competent members to best achieve shared goals. The competence-based perspective on rank attainment has gar-
- 577KB
- 23
Nov 19, 2012 · On one hand, a number of theo rists have argued that rank acquisition ... is assessed in terms of actual Dominance—based . ... and coexist as viable rank-attainm ent strategies ...
In this view, rank (i.e., social influence) is allocated to individuals who show a dominant, authoritative demeanor, and not, as the competence-based perspective suggests, on the basis of rational calculation about others’ abilities or expertise. Consistent with this account, a number of studies indicate that rank is often associated
(2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. doi:10.1037/a0030398. Chapters 4 and 5 are based on work conducted in the Emotion and Self Lab and the Culture
People also ask
Is dominance a viable route to rank acquisition?
Are dominance and prestige effective routes to social rank?
What is the dominant prestige model of social rank acquisition?
Are dominance and prestige a viable strategy for ascending the social hierarchy?
Are dominance and prestige a viable avenue to social R NK and influence?
Do dominance and prestige represent different ways of attaining rank?
Mar 1, 2019 · The results of the current research indicate that whilst all humans have the propensity to utilize prestige and dominance as rank acquisition strategies and that both pathways are viable routes for accruing rank, the evidence further suggests that socio-cultural processes and network structure largely govern an individual’s behaviour and rank acquisition strategy.
