Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

  1. Some software only supports MSVC on Windows (e.g. CPython, including native modules) so you may have to use it. The only advantage is that you get a statically-linked CRT — versus linking against an old msvcrt.dll per Mingw-w64 — though historically Microsoft's UCRT has been kind of buggy, and those bugs then get baked into your binaries.

  2. We have the MinGW-W64 that is a fork of MinGW that supports those features and I was wondering, which one to use? Knowing that GCC is one of the most used C++ compilers. Or it's better to use the MSVC (VC++) on Windows and GCC on Linux and use CMake to handle with the independent compiler?

  3. Apr 16, 2017 · I started to experiment with a MinGW 64 bit self-compiled Qt version, which was compared to the MinGW 32bit version bulky and slow. Since there was no direct need for 64 bit I switched simply back to 32 bit.

  4. MingW is a windows port of GCC. MS-cl, Clang-cl, Clang++, g++, gpp. cl.exe is the name of the executable that actually does the compiling (and linking) for MSVC, clang-cl is just the LLVM equivalent. g++ is GCC's C++ compiler executable.

  5. Clang's big advantage is that it's compatible with msvc's ecosystem, so it's pretty much a drop in replacement most of the time, and it has generally better codegen than msvc and far better diagnostics.

  6. MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

  7. People also ask

  8. MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

  1. People also search for