Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.reddit.com › r › C_ProgrammingMSVC vs MinGW vs Clang for Windows in 2020? - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › C_Programming

   • Cached

   MSVC code generation quality is almost on par with GCC and Clang. It doesn't quite support C99 and probably never will. The toolchain is not nearly as powerful or flexible as Mingw-w64. For instance, import libs are still mandatory (for outdated historical reasons), unlike Mingw-w64 where they're completely optional. 16.

2. stackoverflow.com › questions › 67848972Differences between msvcrt, ucrt and vcruntime libraries

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 67848972

   Jun 5, 2021 · This is a good answer, but it doesn't explain the relationship between ucrt and vcruntime, which the question was also asking. The answer to that is, Microsoft split their CRT into two parts, one which was specific to their compilers (vcruntime), the other generic to all compliers (ucrt). So if you are using a non-Microsoft compiler (like Clang ...

3. www.reddit.com › r › cppMinGW vs Visual C++ on performance? : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › cpp

   • Cached

   MinGW because it's the closest to GCC and gives me a good indication of whether or not my code will compile cross-platform without having to wait for the build system. My code has to run on OSX, Linux and Windows. Visual C++ because it often has higher performance with math calculations than MinGW. It's often comparable to GCC on Linux though.

4. www.reddit.com › r › cpp[Q] Windows: non-MSVC Toolchains : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › cpp

   • Cached

   all the modern windows toolchains use msvc standard C libraries, even the mingw ones. That's why msys2 offers both ucrt and msvcrt variants of mingw-w64-gcc and mingw-w64-clang. They do use their own C++ standard library implementations though (not sure about the Clang that ships with Visual Studio though)

5. dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvcMinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   • Cached

   Apr 22, 2016 · The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC. I have tried to use link-time optimization with MinGW-w64, but I have failed.

6. exchangetuts.com › mingw-vs-mingw-w64-vs-msvc-vcMinGW vs MinGW-W64 vs MSVC (VC++) in cross compiling

   exchangetuts.com › mingw-vs-mingw-w64-vs-msvc-vc

   • Cached

   MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

7. People also ask

   Is MSVC better than MinGW-w64?

   • MSVC code generation quality is almost on par with GCC and Clang. It doesn't quite support C99 and probably never will. The toolchain is not nearly as powerful or flexible as Mingw-w64. For instance, import libs are still mandatory (for outdated historical reasons), unlike Mingw-w64 where they're completely optional.

   MSVC vs MinGW vs Clang for Windows in 2020? : r/C_Programming - R…

   www.reddit.com/r/C_Programming/comments/lgz1xa/msvc_vs_mingw_vs_clang_for_windows_in_2020/

   See all results for this question

   Is OCCT better than MinGW-w64?

   • OCCT DLL Sizes: MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

   MinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org/content/mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Is GCC better than MSVC?

   • They're not made to be substitutable plugins (although Clang is working on becoming that way). GCC is a fine compiler, and can produce code that has pretty much the same performance, if not better, than MSVC. It is missing some low-level Windows-specific features though. Apart from this, to answer your questions:

   GCC worth using on Windows to replace MSVC? - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/8029092/gcc-worth-using-on-windows-to-replace-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Does MinGW-w64 support ucrt?

   • Microsoft made the "universal run time" (aka UCRT) available to help such projects break their dependency on msvcrt.dll but as yet MinGW has not taken advantage of it. But this is enormous problem - if compiled with gcc mathematical software is two times slower than compiled with mscv! @HansPassant, MinGW-w64 does support UCRT.

   visual c++ - Why MINGW64 gcc produce much SLOWER code than MS…

   stackoverflow.com/questions/76238757/why-mingw64-gcc-produce-much-slower-code-than-msvc-for-this-source

   See all results for this question

   Can I use Visual Studio compiler with MinGW & Visual Studio?

   • If you have any info on this, thanks! Visual studio compiler is (or will be soon) available as a command line standalone application. So you can use any ide and compile with both compilers anyways. Personally I use eclipse and write code that compiles both with mingw and visual studio via cmake :)

   MinGW vs Visual C++ on performance? : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/4kv7nq/mingw_vs_visual_c_on_performance/

   See all results for this question

   Is MSVCRT faster than sin()?

   • What you are actually comparing are the C runtime implementations of the sin () function. The MinGW project made a historical mistake of not implementing (or borrowing) their own C runtime. Relying instead on msvcrt.dll, an old dog that has not been improved over the past 25 years. Yes, it is that much slower for sin ().

   visual c++ - Why MINGW64 gcc produce much SLOWER code than MS…

   stackoverflow.com/questions/76238757/why-mingw64-gcc-produce-much-slower-code-than-msvc-for-this-source

   See all results for this question

8. sourceforge.net › p › mingw-w64MinGW-w64 - for 32 and 64 bit Windows / Discussion / Open ...

   sourceforge.net › p › mingw-w64

   • Cached

   Mar 12, 2015 · A quick test revealed that the implementation shipped by MinGW-w64 needs roughly twice as much time as those from Cygwin or MSVCRT. Furthermore, a custom MinGW-w64 build which uses the implementation of MSVCRT rather than its own yields about the same performance for svm-train as the prebuilt binary (unmodified: 32s vs. 20s runtime for a ...