Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.reddit.com › r › C_ProgrammingMSVC vs MinGW vs Clang for Windows in 2020? : r/C ... - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › C_Programming

   • Cached

   The only advantage is that you get a statically-linked CRT — versus linking against an old msvcrt.dll per Mingw-w64 — though historically Microsoft's UCRT has been kind of buggy, and those bugs then get baked into your binaries.

2. stackoverflow.com › questions › 24417906c++ - MinGW vs MinGW-W64 vs MSVC (VC++) in cross compiling ...

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 24417906

   We have the MinGW-W64 that is a fork of MinGW that supports those features and I was wondering, which one to use? Knowing that GCC is one of the most used C++ compilers. Or it's better to use the MSVC (VC++) on Windows and GCC on Linux and use CMake to handle with the independent compiler?

3. www.reddit.com › mingw_vs_visual_c_on_performanceMinGW vs Visual C++ on performance? : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › mingw_vs_visual_c_on_performance

   • Cached

   Visual C++ because it often has higher performance with math calculations than MinGW. It's often comparable to GCC on Linux though. Visual C++ debugs better on Windows too.

4. www.reddit.com › r › cpp_questionsWhat is the difference between compilers? : r/cpp_questions

   www.reddit.com › r › cpp_questions

   • Cached

   The default standard library (libstdc++) has better C++20 and C++23 support than Clang's (libc++) but not as good as Visual C++. Developing Windows applications with GCC (mingw-GCC) generally means shipping extra DLLs with your program, for the standard library.

5. dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvcMinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   • Cached

   Apr 22, 2016 · MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

6. exchangetuts.com › mingw-vs-mingw-w64-vs-msvc-vcMinGW vs MinGW-W64 vs MSVC (VC++) in cross compiling

   exchangetuts.com › mingw-vs-mingw-w64-vs-msvc-vc

   • Cached

   MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

7. People also ask

   Is MinGW better than MSVC?

   • In general they produce binaries of more or less comparable performance. But implementation of c++11 synchronization primitives in mingw, at least up to not so distant past, was much much worse than in msvc (2015). And windows environment is not very friendly for gcc based toolchain that spawns a lot of processes.

   MinGW vs Visual C++ on performance? : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/4kv7nq/mingw_vs_visual_c_on_performance/

   See all results for this question

   Is OCCT better than MinGW-w64?

   • OCCT DLL Sizes: MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

   MinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org/content/mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Is MinGW-w64 Seh better than MSVC 2010?

   • As it can be seen, average performance of MSVC 2010, 2017, and MinGw-w64 SEH is nearly the same. Though, many tests show essentially different CPU time between MinGw SEH and MSVC 2010 (mostly within +-50%), but these deviations go in both directions and have not much effect on the average.

   MinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org/content/mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Is GCC better than MSVC?

   • They're not made to be substitutable plugins (although Clang is working on becoming that way). GCC is a fine compiler, and can produce code that has pretty much the same performance, if not better, than MSVC. It is missing some low-level Windows-specific features though. Apart from this, to answer your questions:

   GCC worth using on Windows to replace MSVC? - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/8029092/gcc-worth-using-on-windows-to-replace-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Should I use GCC (MinGW) or MSYS2?

   • I would go with gcc (MinGW) or clang. If you combine it with MSyS2, you get nearly a linux-like environment. There is no reason to use MSVC, except you have to. It's a bloated compiler (Like some GBs of installation), not supporting newer C than C99 IIRC, and it is nearly unusable from the commandline

   MSVC vs MinGW vs Clang for Windows in 2020? : r/C_Programming - R…

   www.reddit.com/r/C_Programming/comments/lgz1xa/msvc_vs_mingw_vs_clang_for_windows_in_2020/

   See all results for this question

   How can I compare a GCC+MinGW-w64 build with a MSVC build?

   • Try building with __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO set to 0, either by using compiler flag -D__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=0 like this at the top of your source file (before the first #include ). Then both builds (GCC+MinGW-w64 and MSVC) will be using the same printf (), so you can compare apples with apples.

   visual c++ - Why MINGW64 gcc produce much SLOWER code than MS…

   stackoverflow.com/questions/76238757/why-mingw64-gcc-produce-much-slower-code-than-msvc-for-this-source

   See all results for this question

8. discourse.julialang.org › t › windows-c-binaryWindows C++ binary compatibility: MinGW vs MSVC

   discourse.julialang.org › t › windows-c-binary

   • Cached

   Jan 2, 2017 · Using MSVC, the C++ standard library is in an entirely different DLL, so the conflict doesn’t exist and both 64bit and 32bit binaries work fine for QML and CxxWrap.