Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.reddit.com › r › C_ProgrammingMSVC vs MinGW vs Clang for Windows in 2020? - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › r › C_Programming

   • Cached

   Some software only supports MSVC on Windows (e.g. CPython, including native modules) so you may have to use it. The only advantage is that you get a statically-linked CRT — versus linking against an old msvcrt.dll per Mingw-w64 — though historically Microsoft's UCRT has been kind of buggy, and those bugs then get baked into your binaries.

2. stackoverflow.com › questions › 8029092c++ - GCC worth using on Windows to replace MSVC? - Stack ...

   stackoverflow.com › questions › 8029092

   Nov 7, 2011 · MSVC has the huge advantage of coming with an IDE that has no equals under Windows, including debugger support. The probably best alternative for MinGW would be Code::Blocks, but there are worlds in between, especially regarding code completion and the debugger.

3. Videos

   • 

     8:02

     youtube.com

     How to install MinGW-w64 on Windows 10/11 [2024 Update] Latest 8.1.0 GNU GCC Compiler

     Jan 20, 2024

     66.7K Views

   • 

     11:59

     youtube.com

     How to install MinGW w64 on Windows 10/11 [2024 Update] MinGW MSYS2 Compiler | C & C++ Programming

     Jun 27, 2023

     24.4K Views

   • 

     8:58

     youtube.com

     How to install MinGW w64 on Windows 10/11 [2024 Update] MinGW GNU Compiler for C C++ Programming

     Jan 11, 2024

     16.2K Views

   View all

4. dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvcMinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org › content › mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   • Cached

   Apr 22, 2016 · MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

5. discourse.julialang.org › t › windows-c-binaryWindows C++ binary compatibility: MinGW vs MSVC

   discourse.julialang.org › t › windows-c-binary

   • Cached

   Jan 2, 2017 · In conclusion, I see 3 solutions: Use the standard Mingw compiler on Appveyor and abandon binaries on the 32 bit Windows platform. Mix Mingw Julia with MSVC CxxWrap and QML binaries. Use the exact same compiler as the one used for Julia. While option 3 is best theoretically, it has two major practical obstacles for which I don’t see the solution:

6. exchangetuts.com › mingw-vs-mingw-w64-vs-msvc-vcMinGW vs MinGW-W64 vs MSVC (VC++) in cross compiling

   exchangetuts.com › mingw-vs-mingw-w64-vs-msvc-vc

   • Cached

   MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

7. www.reddit.com › r › cppShould the MSVC compiler be my primary choice on Windows?

   www.reddit.com › r › cpp

   • Cached

   Nov 25, 2014 · Yes, IMO your best option on Windows is to stick with MSVC or ABI compatible compilers. As for missing out on the 'new and shiny stuff', if you're just learning the new things then you can just stick to learning what MSVC supports and you won't be bothered.

8. People also ask

   Is MSVC better than MinGW?

   • Also, MSVC lets you use some proprietary Microsoft stuff (MFC, ATL, and possibly others) that MinGW has no support for, and makes using GDI+ and DirectX easier and more straightforward (though it is possible to do both with MinGW).

   GCC worth using on Windows to replace MSVC? - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/8029092/gcc-worth-using-on-windows-to-replace-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Is OCCT better than MinGW-w64?

   • OCCT DLL Sizes: MSVC is doing the compilation job significantly faster than MinGW-w64. The DLL sizes are comparable, if optimization is set to "-O2" for MinGW-w64, with "-O3" the DLLs from MinGW-w64 are larger. Binary files compiled with MinGW-w64 are performing significantly better than those compiled with MSVC.

   MinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org/content/mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Is MinGW compliant?

   • I am worried about how compliant the MinGW compiler is. First, MinGW is not a compiler, but an environment, it is bundled with gcc. If you think of using gcc to compile code and have it call the Windows API, it's okay as it's C; but for C++ DLLs generated by MSVC, you might have a harsh wake-up call.

   MS vs Non-MS C++ compiler compatibility - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/7119588/ms-vs-non-ms-c-compiler-compatibility

   See all results for this question

   Is MinGW-w64 Seh better than MSVC 2010?

   • As it can be seen, average performance of MSVC 2010, 2017, and MinGw-w64 SEH is nearly the same. Though, many tests show essentially different CPU time between MinGw SEH and MSVC 2010 (mostly within +-50%), but these deviations go in both directions and have not much effect on the average.

   MinGW-w64 vs. MSVC - Forum Open Cascade Technology

   dev.opencascade.org/content/mingw-w64-vs-msvc

   See all results for this question

   Is MinGW worth it?

   • MFC is a separate issue, of course, but at least as far as Windows API programming is concerned, MingW is worth a shot. @Kerrek: Thanks, I have amended the text to reflect the difference between the Windows provided ABI and C++ libraries compiled for Windows as those are different beasts.

   MS vs Non-MS C++ compiler compatibility - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/7119588/ms-vs-non-ms-c-compiler-compatibility

   See all results for this question

   Is GCC/MinGW a good compiler?

   • Despite all that, GCC/MinGW is an entirely reliable quality compiler, which in my opinion outperforms any to date available version of MSVC in terms of quality of generated code. This is somewhat less pronounced with the most recent versions of MSVC, but still visible.

   GCC worth using on Windows to replace MSVC? - Stack Overflow

   stackoverflow.com/questions/8029092/gcc-worth-using-on-windows-to-replace-msvc

   See all results for this question

9. www.reddit.com › q_windows_nonmsvc_toolchains[Q] Windows: non-MSVC Toolchains : r/cpp - Reddit

   www.reddit.com › q_windows_nonmsvc_toolchains

   • Cached

   Mar 1, 2023 · all the modern windows toolchains use msvc standard C libraries, even the mingw ones. That's why msys2 offers both ucrt and msvcrt variants of mingw-w64-gcc and mingw-w64-clang. They do use their own C++ standard library implementations though (not sure about the Clang that ships with Visual Studio though)