Search results
- According to a survey published in the journal Nature last summer, more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments.
www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778Most scientists 'can't replicate studies by their peers' - BBC
Nov 1, 2015 · Now, the most comprehensive investigation ever done about the rate and predictors of reproducibility in social and cognitive sciences has found that regardless of the analytic method or criteria used, fewer than half of the original findings were successfully replicated.
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- 2015
Feb 22, 2017 · Science is facing a "reproducibility crisis" where more than two-thirds of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments, research suggests. This is frustrating...
Dec 3, 2018 · A study may be replicable in the former sense but not in the second sense: one might be able to replicate the methods, procedures and analysis of a study, but fail to successfully replicate the results of the original study.
- Fiona Fidler, John Wilcox
- 2018
May 7, 2019 · In both models, changes implemented by social media platforms in algorithms, APIs, and other internal characteristics over time make it impossible to computationally reproduce analytic models and to have confidence that equivalent data for reproducibility can be collected over time.
- Division on Earth, Cognitive Board on Behavioral
- 2019/05/07
- 2019
Jan 1, 2024 · More than 90% of studies predicted not to replicate did not replicate, while 66% of studies predicted to replicate actually replicated [11]. The ability of researchers to judge (to some extent) data quality strongly suggests that there are factors in addition to the technical variability that affect reproducibility and that can be addressed to ...
May 7, 2019 · Improving substandard research practices—including poor study design, failure to report details, and inadequate data analysis—has the potential to improve reproducibility and replicability by ensuring that research is more rigorous, thoughtful, and dependable.
People also ask
Why is reproducibility important in life science research?
How can substandard research practices improve reproducibility and replicability?
Why is research not reproducible?
Is a poorly designed study reproducible?
Can open science reform improve reproducibility in science?
Does open science solve reproducibility problems?
Failures of reproducibility cannot be traced to a single cause, but there are several categories of shortcomings that can explain many of the cases where research cannot be reproduced. Here...
