Search results
The ultimate concern “excludes all other concerns from ultimate significance; it makes them preliminary”; it “is unconditional, independent of any conditions of character, desire, or circumstance”; it “is total: no part of ourselves or of our world is excluded from it”; it “is infinite” (11-12).
Sep 19, 2020 · The influential twentieth-century Christian theologian and philosopher Paul Tillich presents his view of religion as being “ultimate concern.” He writes that, “Religion, in the largest and most basic sense of the word, is ultimate concern.
Mar 21, 2024 · In understanding Tillich’s theology, it is important to begin with his two key concepts: faith and God. Tillich considered faith not a belief in the unbelievable, but the ‘state of being grasped by an ultimate concern’; and he conceived of God not as a being, but as ‘the ground of being’.
- Ted Farris
Jan 1, 2020 · The concept of ultimate concern originated in the writings of Paul Tillich (1951, 1957), who was an existential theologian and philosopher that impacted the development of existential psychology in the United States.
Tillich explains that the structure and protection of the law make life “possible and satisfying,” allowing for “continuous actualization” of the ultimate concern in the existential reality (67).
Here Tillich explains that any expression of ultimate concern must be expressed symbolically “because symbolic language alone is able to express the ultimate” (47). God functions as the most fundamental symbol for ultimate concern.
People also ask
What does Paul Tillich say about religion?
What does Tillich mean by ultimate concern?
Where did the concept of ultimate concern come from?
Why did the Supreme Court consider Paul Tillich a 'ultimate concern'?
What does 'ultimate concern' mean?
Is ultimate concern a basis for understanding religion?
Although Tillich's work could be viewed as a catalyst for the Court's opinion on the Free Exercise Clause, the introduction of "ultimate concern" as a. dispositive criterion in the constitutional interpretation of religion is rooted in the judicial history of conscription cases.
