Yahoo Canada Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: ronald v. elliot & family law divorce family law group
  2. We'll Find You the Right Divorce Lawyer for Free. Prices and Reviews Upfront.

Search results

  1. Jun 22, 2022 · Even prior to Barendregt, Superior Courts have been interpreting the “parenting time factor” in the amended Divorce Act to mean that there is not “a presumption in favour of equal time or maximum time with each parent” (McBennett v. Danis, 2021 CarswellOnt 7411 (S.C.J.), para. 89; S.C v. C.C., 2022 CarswellOnt 6713 (S.C.J.), para. 34).

  2. Aug 19, 2021 · The Trial Judge imputed income to the mother at $45,000/year, this was set aside, and income was imputed to the mother at $80,000. Spousal support was adjusted accordingly. The matter was remitted to Queen’s Bench for a new trial, but the child is to stay with the mother pending trial. JD v DCP, et al, 2020 PECA 14.

  3. CONTACT US. Given the sensitive nature of family law issues, a member of our client experience team will have a brief phone conversation with you before booking your consultation with one of our lawyers. If you’re interested in scheduling a consultation with one of our lawyers, please contact the office by phone at: 1-519-672-5953.

  4. When that home is considered family property, Rule 15-8 gives the Court discretion to order the sale of the property. Rule 15-8 (1) of the Supreme Court Family Rules reads as follows: Court may order sale. (1) If in a family law case it appears necessary or expedient that property be sold, the court may order the sale and may order a person in ...

  5. Apr 9, 1997 · Elliott v. Elliott (1997), 201 A.R. 268 (QB) ... Family Law - Topic 4012. Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance awards - Lump sum and periodic pay­ments - A ...

    • April 09, 1997
    • of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • (1997), 201 A.R. 268 (QB)
    • Rawlins, J.
  6. May 24, 2022 · A significant development has been the recognition of the tort of family violence. In A. v. A., Mandhane J. recognized, for the first time, the tort of family violence, and awarded damages of $150,000.00 (2022 ONSC 1303). Mandhane J. reasoned that: " [t]he Divorce Act does not provide a victim/survivor (“survivor”) with a direct avenue to ...

  7. Mr. Petroff has been voted by the American Institute of Family Law Attorneys as one of the 10 best family law lawyers under the age of 40 in the state of Ohio for 2014 and 2015. He won a similar award from the American Society of Legal Advocates in 2014. In 2015, Mr. Petroff was voted as being one of the nation’s top 1% of attorneys by the ...

  1. People also search for