Search results
(especially for novice or early career researchers). Keywords Scientic research · Publications · Medical publications · Clinical medicine · Peer review · Academic training · Abstracting and indexing Introduction The writing and editing of scientic papers should be done in parallel with the collection and analysis of epidemiologi-
- 705KB
- Payam Behzadi, Márió Gajdács, Márió Gajdács
- 13
- 2021
Jul 28, 2021 · Scientific writing is an important skill in both academia and clinical practice. The skills for writing a strong scientific paper are necessary for researchers (comprising academic staff and ...
- Title
- Abstract
- Keywords
- Introduction
- Materials and Methods
- Results
- Discussion and Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Conflict of Interest
- References
As the title is the first section of your paper which is seen by the readers, it is important for the authors to take time on appropriately formulating it. The nature of title may attract or dismiss the readers (Tullu and Karande 2017). In this regard, a title should be the mirror of the paper’s content; hence, a proper title should be attractive, ...
The abstract is the vitrine of a manuscript, which should be sequential, arranged, structured and summarized with great effort and special care. This section is the second most important part of a manuscript after title (Behzadi and Gajdács 2020). The abstract should be written very carefully, deliberately and comprehensively in perfect English, be...
Keywords are the key point words and terms of the manuscript which come right after abstract section. The keywords are used for searching papers in the related fields by internet search engines. It is recommended to employ 3 to 10 keywords in this section. The keywords should be selected from the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) service, NCBI (https...
Introduction section should be framed up to four paragraphs (up to 15% of the paper’s content). This section should be progressed gradually from general to specific information and gaps (in a funnel-formed fashion). In another words, the current condition of the problem and the previous studies should be briefly presented in the first paragraph. Mo...
As the materials and methods section constitutes the skeleton of a paper (being indicative of the quality of the data), this section is known as the keystone of the research. A poor, flawed or incorrect methodology may result in the direct rejection of manuscripts, especially in high IF journals, because it cannot link the introduction section into...
The results including negative and positive outcomes should be reported clearly in this section with no interpretation (Audisio et al. 2009; Behzadi et al. 2013). The most original information of an IMRAD paper originates from the results section. Indeed, the reported findings are the main core of the study which answers to the research question (h...
This section represents the interpretations of results. In other words, discussion describes what these results do mean by the help of mechanistic interpretations of causes and effects. This argument should be achieved sharp and strong in a logical manner (Gajdács 2020; Rasko et al. 2016). The interpretations should be supported by relevant referen...
This section is placed right after discussion and/or conclusion section. The unsaid contributors with pale activities who cannot be recognized as the manuscripts’ authors should be mentioned in acknowledgement section. Financial sponsors, coordinators, colleagues, laboratory staff and technical supporters, scientific writing proof readers, institut...
If the authors have any concerns regarding moral or financial interests, they should declare it unambiguously, because the related interests may lead to biases and suspicions of misconducts (Ahlstrom 2017; Behzadi 2021; Lilleyman 1995; Tahaei et al. 2021). This section usually comes right after acknowledgements and before references.
Application of relevant and pertinent references supports the manuscript’s scientific documentary. Moreover, utilization of related references with high citation helps the quality of the manuscript. For searching references, it is recommended to use search engines like Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/), databases such as MEDLINE (https:/...
- Payam Behzadi, Márió Gajdács, Márió Gajdács
- 2021
Keywords Scientific research · Publications · Medical publications · Clinical medicine · Peer review · Academic training · Abstracting and indexing Introduction The writing and editing of scientific papers should be done in parallel with the collection and analysis of epidemiological data or during the performance of laboratory experiments, as it is an integral step of practical research.
- Payam BEHZADI
Mar 25, 2019 · The aim of th is study is to firstly identify factors t hat influence medical students’ career choices using a. cross sectional study. Secondly, to analyze wh ich factors are t he most ...
Jul 28, 2021 · The present review aimed to introduce the details of creating a strong original article for publication (especially for novice or early career researchers). Scientific writing is an important skill in both academia and clinical practice. The skills for writing a strong scientific paper are necessary for researchers (comprising academic staff and health-care professionals). The process of a ...
People also ask
Why is scientific writing important for medical students?
Is scientific writing a part of a medical program?
Is writing a scientific paper a career-critical skill?
When should a scientific paper be written and edited?
What happens if you lack scientific writing skills?
Why do medical students choose a career?
Feb 19, 2015 · The integrated academic career path has five principal steps: medical school, AFP, ACF, clinical lecturer, and senior academic. Medical school Intercalated degrees entail an extra year of study and are done by around one third of medical students. 4 Other opportunities include involvement in research projects alongside your medical studies or in summer breaks, and research based student ...
