Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. inequality.org › research › excessive-wealth-has-runExcessive Wealth Has Run Amok—This Must Stop

   inequality.org › research › excessive-wealth-has-run

   Mar 6, 2024 · The effects of excessive wealth can be seen throughout US society—in the high rents resulting from private equity acquisition of housing, in tax structures, and in billionaire domination of our political system. If we are serious about narrowing the racial wealth gap, this silence needs to change. It’s time to change public policy to do ...

2. www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024

   • Cached

   Apr 8, 2024 · Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth. 2024 Jan/Feb Details. An introduction to limitarianism, and why there should be an upper limit on how much money people can accumulate. Current Affairs. filed 08 April 2024 in Interviews. Ingrid Robeyns is a professor at Utrecht University, where she specializes in political philosophy and ethics.

3. Videos

   • 

     5:13

     youtube.com

     Should We Abolish Billionaires? | Robert Reich

     Jul 1, 2019

     193.6K Views

   • 

     2:43

     tiktok.com

     Common Habits Preventing Wealth Accumulation

     Dec 13, 2022

     16.9K Views

   • 

     5:44

     bbc.com

     Should we ban billionaires?

     Nov 1, 2020

   View all

4. link.springer.com › article › 10Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires | Ethical ...

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Nov 23, 2022 · The second argument in favor of preventing extreme wealth accumulation, advanced by Robeyns and Robert Reich (2018), states that billionaires have an inappropriate amount of influence in public life, which undermines political equality. We argue that corporate leaders tend to be more accountable to their fellow citizens than public officials.

5. www.latimes.com › opinion › storyOpinion: No more billionaires? Let's be more ambitious. No ...

   www.latimes.com › opinion › story

   Jan 29, 2024 · Why should society limit extreme personal wealth? Excess wealth keeps the poor in poverty while inequality grows. Research shows that the lion’s share of the gains that economies wield go to ...

   • Author: Ingrid Robeyns

6. www.academia.edu › 110711093 › Wealth_Without_LimitsWealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires - Academia.edu

   www.academia.edu › 110711093 › Wealth_Without_Limits

   • Cached

   For example, Ingrid Robeyns argues that public officials should prevent people from amassing extreme wealth because billionaires’ resources would be better spent addressing morally important goals such as meeting disadvantaged people’s needs and solving collective action problems.2 Robert B. Reich states that billionaires have an inappropriate amount of influence in public life, which ...

   • Author: Christopher Freiman

7. theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealthLimitarianism: could we put a cap on extreme wealth?

   theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealth

   • Cached

   Apr 5, 2024 · And in a small way, this has already started to happen – 250 millionaires and billionaires signed an open letter to world leaders at this year's World Economic Forum in Davos demanding a wealth tax.

8. People also ask

   Does preventing extreme wealth accumulation undermine political equality?

   • The second argument in favor of preventing extreme wealth accumulation, advanced by Robeyns and Robert Reich (2018), states that billionaires have an inappropriate amount of influence in public life, which undermines political equality. We argue that corporate leaders tend to be more accountable to their fellow citizens than public officials.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

   What are some arguments against billionaires?

   • Democratic Accountability in Corporate America. Another argument against billionaires is that public officials should not allow private citizens to amass enormous amounts of wealth that are not subject to democratic oversight or control.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

   Do billionaires deserve to keep their wealth?

   • On this view, billionaires do not deserve to keep their wealth because taxpayers are entitled to a return on the public investments that enabled billionaires to become so wealthy. But this is an implausible theory of desert which, if applied consistently, would be counterproductive to economic egalitarian aims both in principle and in practice.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

   Should billionaires spend more money addressing disadvantaged people's needs?

   • The first argument in favor of such a proposal, recently advanced by Ingrid Robeyns (2018), states that billionaires’ resources would be better spent addressing morally important goals such as meeting disadvantaged people’s needs and solving collective action problems.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

   Do billionaires have a presumptive advantage over public officials?

   • For this reason, billionaires have a presumptive advantage over public officials in debates about whether there should be limits on the amount of wealth they can accumulate. To this argument, one might argue that even if billionaires provide material benefits, they harm their fellow citizens in a non-material way.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

   Should taxes prevent people from becoming billionaires?

   • Despite the foregoing defense, we grant that proposals to enforce taxes that prevent people from becoming billionaires are not a particularly morally urgent policy problem. After all, there are fewer than 700 billionaires in the United States.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

9. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › 36466110Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires - PubMed

   pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › 36466110

   The second argument in favor of preventing extreme wealth accumulation, advanced by Robeyns and Robert Reich (2018), states that billionaires have an inappropriate amount of influence in public life, which undermines political equality. We argue that corporate leaders tend to be more accountable to their fellow citizens than public officials ...