Search results
If you forced me to choose one with a crossbow on my head, I would probably say I prefer Iorveth's path by a small margin, but Roche's also has its merits. So here's my definitive pros and cons list. ROCHE
Like everyone said, you should play twice. Both sides offer a deeper look at the current political situation, the people and it's problems and you learn that there is no correct path.
Aug 3, 2011 · Gameplay-wise, I thought for the most part Iorveth's path had a better main quest line and Roche's path had better side quests. Story-wise, I'm completely torn between them. I love both Roche and Saskia.
I think Roche’s path is more of a sensible choice from Geralt’s perspective, especially when you take the Witcher 3 into consideration. Iorveth is a great character though, the choice is very difficult.
Jun 30, 2011 · I'd say that people who have a penchant for making decisions blindly should start with Roche, and those who obsess over details and drive themselves crazy figuring everything out on their first play should start with Iorveth.
Nov 16, 2015 · If you stick with the Iorveth path, you can eventually watch Roche from afar using magic. He tells his men you are innocent, and not to attack you if they encounter you again. Even after you betrayed him to join an outright terrorist cell, he tells them to stand down if they meet you, because he believes in you.
People also ask
Should I play Iorveth vs Roche?
Is Iorveth better than Vernon Roche in Witcher 3?
Which is better Roche or ivoreth?
Do you like Roche or ioverth?
Should I side with Iorveth or Roche in Witcher 2?
Do you like Roche Chapter 2 or Iorveth's Chapter 3 better?
Sep 10, 2014 · There's a reference to it right when you character meets Iorveth for the first time and Geralt talks about Iorveth being used. That said, it's your choice. I would create two saves and play through both branches to experience the full game. I believe it's the only choice of consequence, if memory serves correctly.
