Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024

   • Cached

   Apr 8, 2024 · There should be no upper limit to wealth as long as the economic pie is growing and the poor are getting some of it. It doesn’t matter if the rich are getting much richer—they create wealth. Why should we care about the top, the upper limit, that you discuss in your book?

2. medium.com › philosophische-essays › the-caseThe Case Against Extreme Wealth - Medium

   medium.com › philosophische-essays › the-case

   • Cached

   Why limiting extreme wealth is essential for societal equity, democracy, and environmental sustainability. The practical benefits of Limitarianism.

3. inequality.org › must-we-limit-the-wealthys-wealthMust We Limit the Wealthy’s Wealth? - Inequality.org

   inequality.org › must-we-limit-the-wealthys-wealth

   Jan 30, 2024 · That needs to change, and Robeyns — with her landmark new book — is asking the questions that can move this change along. Why should we be letting our wealthiest grab so much of the treasure we are all creating? Why should we be letting our richest few do that grabbing at the expense of so many?

4. theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealthLimitarianism: could we put a cap on extreme wealth?

   theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealth

   • Cached

   Apr 5, 2024 · Developed countries with adequate social safety nets, such as her native Netherlands, should impose a limit of €10 million (£8.5 million) on individual personal wealth, according to Robeyns....

5. blogs.lse.ac.uk › inequalities › 2024/03/13Limitarianism: Why to cap personal wealth | LSE Inequalities

   blogs.lse.ac.uk › inequalities › 2024/03/13

   • Cached

   Mar 13, 2024 · If we want to limit wealth so that we can tackle poverty, protect democracy, reverse ecological degradation, pay for the nation’s healthcare and eliminate undeserved riches, then where should we draw the line?

6. andrewmurraysm.files.wordpress.com › 2018 › 10Aristotle and Locke on the Moral Limits of Wealth

   andrewmurraysm.files.wordpress.com › 2018 › 10

   the lines that business is about generating wealth for the community and that, although it follows the ‘laws’ of economy or of the market, it should not be subject to legal or moral limits. Nevertheless, the essay may well be read alone for the specific question it raises. The essay will draw on the first two books of

7. People also ask

   Should we limit wealth?

   • If we want to limit wealth so that we can tackle poverty, protect democracy, reverse ecological degradation, pay for the nation’s healthcare and eliminate undeserved riches, then where should we draw the line? There are two limits to wealth that we should consider: a political limit and an ethical limit. These are set at different levels.

   Limitarianism: Why to cap personal wealth | LSE Inequalities

   blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/03/13/limitarianism-the-case-for-capping-personal-wealth/

   See all results for this question

   Is there an upper limit on wealth?

   • Ultimately, you come to the conclusion that there has to be an upper limit on the amount of wealth that can be possessed. That’s my argument. There are important values like the survival of the human species on Earth.

   Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/04/why-we-need-limits-on-extreme-wealth

   See all results for this question

   Should wealth go to the people with the least?

   • If you’re a billionaire, each additional dollar is virtually meaningless, whereas if you are a person who is earning $2 a day, each additional dollar is really important to you. So, as wealth is created, that should make us lean towards favoring it going to the people with the least. Yes.

   Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/04/why-we-need-limits-on-extreme-wealth

   See all results for this question

   Should we be working towards a world without extreme wealth?

   • We also must do something about the other end of the wealth distribution. More concretely, we should be working towards a world without extreme wealth. That view is called limitarianism – a moral and political upper limit to how much personal wealth any one individual can have. What are the reasons for this view?

   Limitarianism: Why to cap personal wealth | LSE Inequalities

   blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/03/13/limitarianism-the-case-for-capping-personal-wealth/

   See all results for this question

   Does preventing extreme wealth accumulation undermine political equality?

   • The second argument in favor of preventing extreme wealth accumulation, advanced by Robeyns and Robert Reich (2018), states that billionaires have an inappropriate amount of influence in public life, which undermines political equality. We argue that corporate leaders tend to be more accountable to their fellow citizens than public officials.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

   Why is excess wealth a problem?

   • The first reason is that excess wealth is directly related to poverty, but not in the way we are usually told. The mainstream view is that the rich create jobs and thereby help the poor to escape poverty. Yet this presents only a very small part of what is going on in the economy and the wider political system that it is set within.

   Limitarianism: Why to cap personal wealth | LSE Inequalities

   blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/03/13/limitarianism-the-case-for-capping-personal-wealth/

   See all results for this question

8. link.springer.com › article › 10Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires | Ethical ...

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Nov 23, 2022 · In this essay we argue against preventing people from amassing extreme wealth via increased taxation. The first argument in favor of such a proposal, recently advanced by Ingrid Robeyns (2018), states that billionaires’ resources would be better spent addressing morally important goals such as meeting disadvantaged people’s needs and ...