Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024

   • Cached

   Apr 8, 2024 · There should be no upper limit to wealth as long as the economic pie is growing and the poor are getting some of it. It doesn’t matter if the rich are getting much richer—they create wealth. Why should we care about the top, the upper limit, that you discuss in your book? Ingrid Robeyns.

2. inequality.org › must-we-limit-the-wealthys-wealthMust We Limit the Wealthy’s Wealth? - Inequality.org

   inequality.org › must-we-limit-the-wealthys-wealth

   Jan 30, 2024 · We need to embrace, as Robeyns so compellingly argues, limits on income and wealth. “A world on fire needs a lot of money to extinguish the flames,” she notes in her new book’s final pages, “and the super-rich are holding onto money they don’t need.”.

3. andrewmurraysm.files.wordpress.com › 2018 › 10Aristotle and Locke on the Moral Limits of Wealth

   andrewmurraysm.files.wordpress.com › 2018 › 10

   the lines that business is about generating wealth for the community and that, although it follows the ‘laws’ of economy or of the market, it should not be subject to legal or moral limits. Nevertheless, the essay may well be read alone for the specific question it raises. The essay will draw on the first two books of

4. www.researchgate.net › publication › 372190731_3(PDF) 3. Limits to Wealth in the History of Western Philosophy

   www.researchgate.net › publication › 372190731_3

   Jul 6, 2023 · Having Too Much is the first academic volume devoted to limitarianism: the idea that the use of economic or ecosystem resources should not exceed certain limits. This concept has deep roots in...

5. www.tandfonline.com › doi › pdfWhat, if Anything, is Wrong with Extreme Wealth?

   www.tandfonline.com › doi › pdf

   ABSTRACT. This paper proposes a view, called limitarianism, which suggests that there should be upper limits to the amount of income and wealth a person can hold. One argument for limitarianism is that superriches can undermine political equality.

   • Author: Ingrid Robeyns

   • Publish Year: 2019

6. link.springer.com › content › pdfWealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires - Springer

   link.springer.com › content › pdf

   The first argument in favor of such a proposal, recently advanced by Ingrid Robeyns (2018), states that billionaires’ resources would be better spent addressing morally important goals such as meeting disadvantaged people’s needs and solving col-lective action problems.

7. People also ask

   Is there an upper limit on wealth?

   • Ultimately, you come to the conclusion that there has to be an upper limit on the amount of wealth that can be possessed. That’s my argument. There are important values like the survival of the human species on Earth.

   Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/04/why-we-need-limits-on-extreme-wealth

   See all results for this question

   Do billionaires deserve to keep their wealth?

   • In Sect. 4, we consider the objection that billionaires’ success is typically a result of pub- lic investment. On this view, billionaires do not deserve to keep their wealth because taxpay- ers are entitled to a return on the public investments that enabled billionaires to become so wealthy.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires - Springer

   link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Should billionaires be able to prevent extreme wealth accumulation?

   • The second argument in favor of preventing extreme wealth accumulation, ad- vanced by Robeyns and Robert Reich (2018), states that billionaires have an inappropri- ate amount of influence in public life, which undermines political equality. We argue that corporate leaders tend to be more accountable to their fellow citizens than public oficials.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires - Springer

   link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3.pdf

   See all results for this question

   Should wealth go to the people with the least?

   • If you’re a billionaire, each additional dollar is virtually meaningless, whereas if you are a person who is earning $2 a day, each additional dollar is really important to you. So, as wealth is created, that should make us lean towards favoring it going to the people with the least. Yes.

   Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/04/why-we-need-limits-on-extreme-wealth

   See all results for this question

   Does preventing extreme wealth accumulation undermine political equality?

   • The second argument in favor of preventing extreme wealth accumulation, advanced by Robeyns and Robert Reich (2018), states that billionaires have an inappropriate amount of influence in public life, which undermines political equality. We argue that corporate leaders tend to be more accountable to their fellow citizens than public officials.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires

   link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3

   See all results for this question

   Should billionaires spend more money addressing disadvantaged people's needs?

   • The first argument in favor of such a proposal, recently advanced by Ingrid Robeyns (2018), states that billionaires’ resources would be better spent addressing morally important goals such as meeting disadvantaged people’s needs and solving col- lective action problems.

   Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires - Springer

   link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-022-10327-3.pdf

   See all results for this question

8. link.springer.com › article › 10Wealth Without Limits: in Defense of Billionaires | Ethical ...

   link.springer.com › article › 10

   • Cached

   Nov 23, 2022 · In Sect. 4, we consider the objection that billionaires’ success is typically a result of public investment. On this view, billionaires do not deserve to keep their wealth because taxpayers are entitled to a return on the public investments that enabled billionaires to become so wealthy.