Yahoo Canada Web Search

Search results

1. www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org › news › 2024

   • Cached

   Apr 8, 2024 · What I’ve said so far is what I think you need for a flourishing, good life. And then there is the question of political limits and how we should organize economic systems so that we try to make sure we end inequality. This is difficult for me to guess because I don’t have solid research here. But in the book, I’ve proposed 10 million.

2. www.latimes.com › opinion › storyOpinion: No more billionaires? We can be more ambitious than ...

   www.latimes.com › opinion › story

   Jan 29, 2024 · Why should society limit extreme personal wealth? Excess wealth keeps the poor in poverty while inequality grows. Research shows that the lion’s share of the gains that economies wield go to ...

   • Author: Ingrid Robeyns

3. theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealthLimitarianism: could we put a cap on extreme wealth?

   theweek.com › limitarianism-cap-on-extreme-wealth

   • Cached

   Apr 5, 2024 · Developed countries with adequate social safety nets, such as her native Netherlands, should impose a limit of €10 million (£8.5 million) on individual personal wealth, according to Robeyns.

4. blogs.lse.ac.uk › inequalities › 2024/03/13Limitarianism: Why to cap personal wealth | LSE Inequalities

   blogs.lse.ac.uk › inequalities › 2024/03/13

   • Cached

   Mar 13, 2024 · There are two limits to wealth that we should consider: a political limit and an ethical limit. These are set at different levels. The political level is democratically decided and embedded in law and institutions; the ethical level is a voluntary, personal decision, where we can take our personal context into account.

5. ips-dc.org › must-we-limit-the-wealthys-wealthMust We Limit the Wealthy’s Wealth? - Institute for Policy ...

   ips-dc.org › must-we-limit-the-wealthys-wealth

   We set limits in our societies, after all, on a regular basis. We limit how fast motorists can drive. We limit how many ducks hunters can shoot. We limit how much noise our neighbors can make. But if we want our human societies to thrive — indeed, in this epoch of climate change, if we want our human species to survive — we need to do more ...

6. blogs.lse.ac.uk › lsereviewofbooks › 2024/02/08Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth – review

   blogs.lse.ac.uk › lsereviewofbooks › 2024/02/08

   • Cached

   Feb 8, 2024 · Robeyns argues that given the wider damage from the enrichment of the few, with its negative impact on economic strength and on wider life chances and social resilience, we must now impose a limit on individual wealth holdings. Thinkers have been making the case for this “limitarianism” and the capping of business rewards for centuries.

7. People also ask

   What are the limits to wealth?

   • There are two limits to wealth that we should consider: one political, the other ethical. They should be set at different levels. The political level should be democratically decided and embedded in law and institutions; the ethical level would be a voluntary, personal decision, in which we can take our personal context into account.

   Opinion: No more billionaires? Let's be more ambitious. No one needs

   www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-01-29/billionaires-extreme-wealth-cap-rich-inequality-taxpayers

   See all results for this question

   Should we limit personal wealth?

   • I call this “limitarianism,” in which societies define a cap on how much personal wealth an individual can accumulate. But we should be morally more ambitious than only wanting to get rid of fortunes that are more than $1 billion. If we look carefully at the reasons for limiting personal wealth, we might well agree on a much lower maximum limit.

   Opinion: No more billionaires? Let's be more ambitious. No one needs

   www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2024-01-29/billionaires-extreme-wealth-cap-rich-inequality-taxpayers

   See all results for this question

   Should we impose a limit on individual wealth holdings?

   • Robeyns argues that given the wider damage from the enrichment of the few, with its negative impact on economic strength and on wider life chances and social resilience, we must now impose a limit on individual wealth holdings. Thinkers have been making the case for this “limitarianism” and the capping of business rewards for centuries.

   Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth – review

   blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2024/02/08/book-review-limitarianism-the-case-against-extreme-wealth-ingrid-robeyns/

   See all results for this question

   Why do we limit wealth?

   • The fourth reason to limit wealth is the most philosophically fundamental of all: no-one can say that they deserve their fortune. Many believe that what we can reap in the market is what we morally deserve. But this is a mistake. Wealth is, to a large extent, the result of various factors that we can in no way take credit for.

   Limitarianism: Why to cap personal wealth | LSE Inequalities

   blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/03/13/limitarianism-the-case-for-capping-personal-wealth/

   See all results for this question

   Should we be working towards a world without extreme wealth?

   • We also must do something about the other end of the wealth distribution. More concretely, we should be working towards a world without extreme wealth. That view is called limitarianism – a moral and political upper limit to how much personal wealth any one individual can have. What are the reasons for this view?

   Limitarianism: Why to cap personal wealth | LSE Inequalities

   blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/03/13/limitarianism-the-case-for-capping-personal-wealth/

   See all results for this question

   Is there an upper limit on wealth?

   • Ultimately, you come to the conclusion that there has to be an upper limit on the amount of wealth that can be possessed. That’s my argument. There are important values like the survival of the human species on Earth.

   Why We Need Limits on Extreme Wealth - Current Affairs

   www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/04/why-we-need-limits-on-extreme-wealth

   See all results for this question

8. www.thenation.com › wealth-cap-limitarianism-davosThe Case for Capping Wealth at $10 Million | The Nation

   www.thenation.com › wealth-cap-limitarianism-davos

   • Cached

   Jan 17, 2024 · And that limit does not lie at a billion: Instead, we should look more in the range of $10 million as a hard cap on personal wealth. And we should encourage everyone to voluntarily not keep more ...